Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Alaska Lawmakers Again Bid to Recriminalize Marijuana
January 12, 2006

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

The Alaska Supreme Court has ruled that state residents can legally possess marijuana for personal use, but that hasn't stopped some lawmakers from trying to recriminalize the drug, the Associated Press reported Jan. 11.

The 1975 decision by the state's highest court holds that residents can possess up to four ounces of marijuana for use in their homes; bills introduced in the state legislature last year and again this year seek to make possession of under four ounces of the drug a misdemeanor and possession of more than four ounces a felony. The measure stalled in the legislature last year despite strong support from Gov. Frank Murkowski.

Murkowski and others argue that the dangers of marijuana use -- including reports that the drug has become more potent -- give lawmakers leeway to make possession a crime despite the Supreme Court ruling, which was made on privacy grounds. "This bill reflects what is currently known about marijuana," said chief assistant attorney general Dean Guaneli. "A lot has changed in the last 30 years."

The latest version of the bill eases penalties somewhat compared to last year's measure; residents in possession of less than an ounce of marijuana, for example, would face a fine rather than prison for their first two offenses.

But critics say that lawmakers should be targeting traffickers, not individual users. "There is no increase (in the bill) in penalties for those with more than a pound available," said Michael Macleod-Ball, executive director of the Alaska Civil Liberties Union, who told lawmakers: "Those are the commercial growers, and those are the ones you should be looking at."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.