Grand Jury Slams Calif.'s Prop 36 June 23, 2005
News Summary
Only about one in four drug offenders sent to treatment rather than prison under California's Proposition 36 actually completes treatment, according to a grand jury report critical of the program.The San Jose Mercury News reported June 21 that the report also found that one in three nonviolent drug offenders in San Mateo County never even show up for their court-ordered treatment sessions.
The report concluded that Proposition 36 has failed to reduce crime or drug use; lack of accountability was cited as the program's major flaw, since offenders don't face jail or other major sanctions for failing to attend treatment or remain abstinent. California Sen. Denise Moreno Ducheny (D-Chula Vista) currently is proposing legislation to alter the program by allowing short-term jail sentences for Prop 36 participants who relapse.
Last fall, a UCLA study found that 31 percent of Prop 36 participants were rearrested, compared to 18 percent of participants in other diversion programs.
Under the current Prop 36 rules, offenders can miss treatment three times before a judge can order them incarcerated.
COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE: