Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 
States Pushing Blood Tests for Drunk Drivers
March 26, 2004

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Generally, when police stop suspected drunk drivers, they require drivers to blow into a breathalyzer to determine blood-alcohol content. But now, more states are requiring authorities to take blood samples, by force if necessary, the Wall Street Journal reported March 23.

"I've really pushed it," said John O'Boyle, district attorney of Pierce County, Wis. He said that breath tests often don't hold up in court. "Blood tests tend to be pretty bulletproof," he added.

Police are also seeing a trend of more people refusing to submit to a breath test and taking the penalty of a one-year license suspension instead of facing a DUI conviction. Furthermore, unlike breath tests -- where it's impossible for authorities to force a test on an individual -- no cooperation is needed for a hospital to draw blood.

"If we have to literally strap you down if you refuse, that's what can happen to you," said Lt. Tony Almaraz, a Nevada Highway Patrol spokesman.

However, using blood tests to fight drunk-driving raises two issues: the amount of force police should be allowed to use to obtain a blood sample, and whether medical professionals are bound to honor a patient's refusal of a blood test and protect their privacy.

"For me to draw blood from a patient who is refusing to have his blood drawn, unless I have compelling medical reasons for that blood sample, I'm committing assault and battery, and I'm not going to do it," said Dr. Phil Brewer, president of the Connecticut College of Emergency Physicians and a fellow at the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

Currently, Alaska, Arizona, Iowa, Florida, Indiana, Michigan, and Nevada have laws that allow police to use reasonable force to obtain blood tests in DUI cases. Seven other states passed laws that permit police to take blood without the driver's consent, but fall short of specifically authorizing force.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)
Enter this word
(help):		 Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.