Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Lawmakers Urged to Repeal Student-Aid Law
April 15, 2003

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Educators and students are urging U.S. lawmakers to repeal a federal law that prevents drug offenders from receiving federal loans and grants to attend college, the Providence Journal reported April 11.

"Access to higher education has always been the way out of poverty for millions of children of immigrants and minority parents," said University of Rhode Island President Robert L. Carothers. "They should not be excluded from higher education, the vehicle by which they can rise above their surroundings."

Carothers asked Rhode Island's congressional delegation to work to repeal the drug provision, which was added to the Higher Education Act in 1998. Since that time, the U.S. Department of Education said about 92,841 students have been denied financial aid because of past drug offenses.

Carothers said the law has a disproportionate impact on low-income and minority students, who are convicted at a higher rate than white drug offenders. He added that the law penalizes people who are trying to better themselves through education.

Student leaders also support repealing the law. "If you're rich, and your parents can afford a good lawyer, or you don't need financial aid, this ban doesn't affect you," said Tom Angell, a member of Students for Sensible Drug Policy and the Coalition for Higher Education Act Reform.

Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.) has introduced legislation to repeal the drug provision. The measure, which is currently in committee, may not pass in this legislative session.

"It's an uphill battle," said Peter Kovar, a spokesman for Frank. "The current leadership of the House does not support the change."

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.