Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Busch Ads Most Popular; Drug/Terror Ads Controversial
February 6, 2002

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

With 10 ads, Anheuser-Busch had the most commercials airing during the Super Bowl, as well as the most popular ones, Reuters reported Feb. 5.

A USA Today poll of 118 viewers during the game found that four of Anheuser-Busch's Super Bowl ads were among the top five most popular. The ads included a pet falcon trained to "fetch" Bud Light, an attempted barroom pickup, and a battle between robots.

"Humor and animals always sell," said Andrew Bergstein, an instructor of marketing at Penn State's Smeal College of Business.

Anheuser-Busch also ran an ad featuring the popular Budweiser Clydesdale horses paying a tribute to New York City and the Sept. 11 attacks.

"I've heard of some people who loved the Clydesdales, but I thought it was completely inappropriate," said Don Pettit of the Sterling Group, a New York-based branding group. "If you're going to do something like that, it has to be a public service, not a promotion of your corporate icon."

Another set of ads that befuddled some ad executives were those linking illicit drug use with terrorism, paid for by the White House's Office of National Drug Control Policy.

"Tying drugs to terrorism was a little out in left field," said Bergstein. "I understand terrorism is a hot-button issue, but it's an awful lot to ask television viewers to draw the line from the Taliban warehoused poppy ... to the World Trade Center -- that's too oblique."

Another advertising expert said that while the ads were compelling, they might have been too serious for the mood surrounding the Super Bowl.

Advertisers spent up to $2 million for each commercial.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:
(Comments now appear first to last)

Your Turn! Post a public comment (guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for everyone, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, brief, and on-topic. Comments are for discussion of the above article, not general rants or manifestos. Serial comments intended to circumvent the 250-word limit may be deleted.

  2. Do not post promotional web links, personal information or requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercial posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.