Supreme Court Rules against Drug-Testing Pregnant Women March 22, 2001
News Summary
Saying it violates the Constitution, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled against the practice of hospitals testing pregnant women for drugs without their consent, the Associated Press reported March 21.The 6-3 ruling was made in the case brought against Medical University of South Carolina, a public hospital in Charleston. Several women who tested positive for cocaine were arrested in their hospital beds under the state's child-endangerment law.
The Supreme Court ruled that the drug testing was unlawful because it violated the Constitution's Fourth Amendment protectionagainst unreasonable searches. In order for drug testing to be conducted, the justices said, a search warrant or consent is required.
"While the ultimate goal of the program may well have been to get the women in question into substance-abuse treatment and off of drugs, the immediate objective of the searches was to generate evidence for law-enforcement purposes in order to reach that goal," Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the court.
In a previous case, the Supreme Court ruled that drug testing could be conducted without a warrant or individual suspicion if the government could demonstrate a "special need." The justices' ruling in the South Carolina case means that drug testing of pregnant women without their consent to protect fetuses cannot be considered a special need.
COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE: