Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Prop 36 Implementation Marred by No-Shows
September 27, 2001

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Summary

Up to a quarter of drug offenders referred to addiction treatment instead of prison under California's Proposition 36 failed to show up at treatment centers, the Christian Science Monitor reported Sept. 25.

Other problems with the system include poor oversight of patients, who sometimes drop out and disappear or secretly keep using drugs. Critics say the fundamental concern is that officials have nothing to hold over offenders' heads except the threat of more treatment.

California has also seen a dropoff in the number of offenders going through drug courts since Proposition 36 was implemented.

But perhaps the biggest problem is inadequate funding for services and for coordination between the probation officers and treatment programs that comprise the heart of the Prop 36 system.

Proponents countered that growing pains were expected, and said that forthcoming funding for drug testing should help improve accountability.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines