Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

U.N. Drug Report Admits Policy Problems, But Slams Legalization Talk
July 5, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Feature
by Bob Curley

International drug-control policies need to be reformed and the solution to growing drug trafficking and related crime lies in recognizing drugs as a health problem -- one that can be prevented, treated and controlled -- but not legalizing and taxing drugs, according to a new report from the United National Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC).

Echoing one of the main arguments of drug-policy reform advocates, the top anti-drug official at the United Nations says that drug prohibition has created "an illicit black market of macro-economic proportions." But UNODC Executive Director Antonio Maria Costa warned that drug legalization would be a "historic mistake" even as the 2009 U.N. World Drug Report praised drug decriminalization policies enacted in Portugal, where possession remains illegal but users face only civil, not criminal penalties.

Decriminalization of smalltime drug use coupled with stepped-up enforcement aimed at traffickers would "keep drugs out of the hands of those who would avoid them under a system of full prohibition, while encouraging treatment, rather than incarceration, for users," the report said.

Costa, who unveiled the report during a Washington, D.C., ceremony with new U.S. drug czar Gil Kerlikowske, said that while the link between drugs and the growth of organized crime crime is undeniable, the solution lies in "more controls on crime, without fewer controls on drugs." 

The 2009 report opens with an acknowledgment that calls for exploring alternatives to drug prohibition have grown as more policymakers and the public have concluded that current drug-control policies have failed. However, the report blasts calls for legalizing and taxing currently illegal drugs as "unethical and uneconomical," comparing the idea to putting a tax on "other seemingly intractable crimes like human trafficking."

The UNODC parries the economic argument for legalization as "naive and myopic," saying that only rich countries would even have a chance of effectively regulating the drug market. 

"Why unleash a drug epidemic in the developing world for the sake of libertarian arguments made by a pro-drug lobby that has the luxury of access to drug treatment?" Costa wrote in the report's executive summary. "Drugs are not harmful because they are controlled -- they are controlled because they are harmful; and they do harm whether the addict is rich and beautiful, or poor and marginalized."

"Proponents of legalization can't have it both ways," said Costa. "A free market for drugs would unleash a drug epidemic, while a regulated one would create a parallel criminal market. Legalization is not a magic wand that would suppress both mafias and drug abuse. Societies should not have to choose between protecting public health or public security: they can, and should do both."

Jack Cole, executive director of Law Enforcement Against Prohibition (LEAP), said Costa "would have you believe that the legalization movement is calling for the abolition of drug control. Quite the contrary, we are demanding that governments replace the failed policy of prohibition with a system that actually regulates and controls drugs, including their purity and prices, as well as who produces them and who they can be sold to."

"The U.N. drug czar is talking out of both sides of his mouth," added Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance (DPA). "On the one hand he admits global drug prohibition is destabilizing governments, increasing violence, and destroying lives. But on the other hand he offers facile arguments dismissing the need for serious debate on alternative drug policies."

Interestingly, DPA and other drug-policy reform groups marked World Drug Day on June 26 by issuing a "call to action" for governments to adopt drug harm-reduction policies such as needle-exchange programs, decriminalize personal use of drugs, and make evidence-based addiction treatment more widely available, among other steps (read PDF). The document did not call for full drug legalization, however, suggesting that perhaps the daylight between drug-policy reformers and international drug-control officials may be narrowing despite the harsh rhetoric from both sides.

Marking World Drug Day on June 26, Costa noted that 5 million people die annually from tobacco use and 2 million die each year from drinking alcohol, while only 200,000 die from illicit-drug use. "Clearly, when you compare drugs to other addictive substances, control is working," he said.

Costa and Kerlikowske both said that investing more resources in drug treatment and prevention was the best strategy for reducing demand and, ultimately, drug trafficking and profits. "We recognize that addiction is a disease and are seeking public-health solutions," said Kerlikowske. "My top priority is to intensify efforts to reduce the demand for drugs which fuels crime and violence around the world."

The report's recommendations for improving drug control emphasized the need to treat addiction as an illness, and for law enforcement to focus on drug trafficking, not drug users. "People who take drugs need medical help, not criminal retribution," said Costa, who called for universal access to drug treatment. Other report recommendations include international agreements against organized crime and greater efficiency in law enforcement.

Globally, the markets for cocaine, opiates and marijuana are either holding steady or in decline, according to the U.N. report, but while use of synthetic drugs may be leveling off in developed countries, consumption of substances like amphetamines, methamphetamine, and ecstasy may be rising in the developing world. Costa said that credit is due to international efforts to control the international drug market.

"The $50 billion global cocaine market is undergoing seismic shifts," said Costa, who recently unveiled a report asserting that cocaine production in Colombia has dropped 18 percent in 2008, with production of the drug down 28 percent. "Purity levels and seizures (in main consumer countries) are down, prices are up, and consumption patterns are in flux. This may help explain the gruesome upsurge of violence in countries like Mexico. In Central America, cartels are fighting for a shrinking market."

The report estimated that 41 percent of all cocaine produced is being seized by law-enforcement officials -- mostly in Colombia -- but only 19 percent of opiates. Costa endorsed the recent shift in antidrug strategy in Afghanistan by the Obama administration, which now plans to focus on interdicting heroin shipments and economic development rather than trying to eradicate poppy crops.

SHARE   

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Tegan McDonough on 06 Jul 09 10:40 AM EDT
America's drug use is fueling much of the Worlds "Terrorist" activities. We are to blame for the Cartels that are "Running" many Countries. Legalize Drugs, Americans will figure out how to grow it, or make it, Here. Prosecute only Smugglers. Use the savings to fight "Addiction", our real Problem.

Posted by Luis M. Lozano on 06 Jul 09 01:14 PM EDT
It seems our friends in the U.N. need some education and awareness. Their thinking and reasoning is in the dark ages when it comes to drug policy reform. Most of the violence and harm caused by keeping these drugs in the black market has created this underground economy and criminal syndicates. It has also put hundreds of thousands of non-violent drug offenders in prisons and escalating the cost of imprisonment. By legalizing and taxing these drugs much of the negative effects can be eliminated or decreased plus we can create a source of revenue to fund treatment and other prevention programs. The reforms the U.N. talks about is simply rearranging the deck chairs on a sinking ship.

Posted by Martin H. Chilcutt on 06 Jul 09 01:56 PM EDT
The U.S. Veterans Administration (VA) has recognized the use of medical marijuana for veteran patients. It is in writing. See: Veteransformedicalmarijuana.org

Posted by Bill Godshall on 06 Jul 09 02:33 PM EDT
If the UNODC truly believed that prohibition and incarceration was the most effective policy to reduce drug problems, it would advocate for the prohibition for tobacco and alcohol (the two deadliest drugs) and incarceration of drinkers and smokers.

Posted by Anonymous on 06 Jul 09 08:33 PM EDT
Most of the nations in the UN are addicted to the cigarette tax money (Pakistan, 10% of all govt. revenues; Indonesia similar, etc.). The "anti-drug" war is basically about keeping cannabis from destroying the tobacco cash cow.

Posted by Verde on 07 Jul 09 02:38 AM EDT
LOL, I love it when potheads mention that drug abuse is non-violent. In that case, why send madoff to prison? He didn't hurt anyone, he just capitalized off someone elses greed. How about the simple fact that laws were written to protect society. When you are too stupid to obey the law, you go to jail. If you don't like the law, change the law. But don't violate it just because you don't like it, or because you think you are smarter than everyone else. And if you violate the law, expect to pay the fine and or go to jail. I thought it was simple.

Posted by Dwayne on 07 Jul 09 07:36 AM EDT
Keep drugs illegal and have more bloodshed.I just love prohibition population control

Posted by Ann Stoker on 07 Jul 09 12:28 PM EDT
Or, Dwayne, make drugs legal and have more families suffer when one member becomes mentally ill or drops out of normal society leaving the rest of us to pay for their rehabilitation. Since Ethan Nadelmann is a self-confessed drug user his rhetoric can be safely dismissed as wanting to 'debate' ad infinitum until his own habit is made legal.

Posted by Verde on 07 Jul 09 02:02 PM EDT
Anonymous one, more money is made of pot than tobacco, and that money is filtered right to all the people that have no legitament income. Of ourse those same people are drawing wellfare and other government disability funds. I don't think legallizing another cash cow is the solution to doing away with the tobacco industry. Most potheads smoke cigarettes too. And don't tell me you know a guy who only smokes weed, that just makes me laugh. Stay sober!

Posted by Eric Wood on 08 Jul 09 10:47 AM EDT
It's about time we hear some definitive talk about shutting down all this clamoring for legalization. Drug abusers all around the nation have been stirring themselves in a frenzy with the inch of latitude given them by the recent political ambiguities and other ill-timed events (ie., Mexico legalizing drug use, the economic collapse). The pro-drug advocates have capitalized on these events like sharks smelling blood. And as usual, they have carted out all their supposed 'research' arguments and flawed logic to rattle the sabres of their crusade. Doesn't anyone else recognize addictive behavior when they see it?

Posted by Smokey on 11 Jul 09 06:47 AM EDT
I don't know exactly how many years Ethan Nadelmann has been involved with alcohol and other chemical issues and problems but I have over 50. That is half a century. I come from experience and professional research into the pro and con. Extensive study into all facets of the problems from a scientific and social position provides in depth understanding. Some of what I have seen as comments here are very good and definitely science and evidence based. Some are emotional bias and yet those comments are important. They become a part of the mix. Only a 360 degree view of the entire problem provides the means to an end. Let's gather those who use a 360 degree view together. Add logic, realistic experience,acceptance,evidence based understanding and some solid science and the positive answers will develop. Remember, a little knowledge and strong emotions are dangerous things.

Posted by silverbird on 12 Jul 09 06:41 PM EDT
As usual, the legalizers arguments make no sense. Doen't go anygood to argue with them. All they want is an easy way to get high.

Posted by Joe Motterotz on 14 Jul 09 02:42 PM EDT
Drug prohibition must end. It is immoral and unbalanced contest that plays monkey-in-the-middle with law enforcement/criminal justice on the one side and the drug infrastructure (cartels down to street-level dealers) on the other. The ball in the middle is the addict and their families. Only the players get rewarded--the ball just gets tossed around. But drug control and regulation does not mean “promote drug use.” Even though alcohol and hard liquor, direct consumption of which is responsible for more death, disease and social ills than all illicit drugs combined, are both legal and promoted to the hilt! I say prohibit all drug promotion including alcohol advertising and legalize, regulate and control all mood-altering substances. All the displaced police, DEA, FBI and other special agencies, penal colonizers, gun manufacturers/sellers, lawyers, interdiction infrastructure and suppliers that would undoubtedly result, could be retrained and re-employed in other areas. Oh, and the massive drop in gun crimes related to drug gangs and their turf wars, could help restore the urban landscape but forcing thugs and gang-bangers to get REAL Jobs.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines