Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Smooth Sailing in Senate for Drug-Czar Nominee
April 8, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Feature
by Bob Curley

The Obama administration's national drug-control strategy will be balanced, science-based, and include a budget containing "proven, effective programs" that will be rigorously assessed and adapted to changing circumstances, Obama drug-czar nominee Gil Kerlikowske told the Senate Judiciary Committee last week.

"I will work diligently to ensure that our efforts are supported by a properly balanced federal drug-control budget -- one which logically implements research-based programs to support and implement that strategy," Kerlikowske told the committee during his April 1 confirmation hearing. "There will be a renewed focus on evidence-based approaches to reduce demand for drugs, through prevention as well as treatment."

Kerlikowske drove the point home by pledging to develop a "strong, transparent monitoring system" for drug-control activities. "While highly complex, performance evaluation of the national drug strategy is key to both validating and tracking the efficacy of the strategic goals and objectives established by the National Drug Control Strategy and the individual programs which are funded to support it," he said.

"Chief Kerlikowske's statement that 'if you can't measure it, you can't improve it' is right on target," said John Carnevale, head of Carnevale Associates and a former budget analyst for the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP). "His interest in performance accountability is precisely in tune with what the public expects -- a results oriented national drug-control policy."

The escalating battle between the Mexican government and that nation's drug cartels, along with its spillover into the U.S. border region, were top-of-mind issues for members of the Senate committee, which will vote later this month on whether to approve Kerlikowske's nomination.

"We face an increasingly globalized threat from drug trafficking organizations that's going to take a new, collaborative, comprehensive approach. This is evidently clear by looking at the news stories coming out of Mexico daily," said Sen. Maria Cantwell (D-Wash.), who along with Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) introduced Kerlikowske to the committee. "Our experience in Colombia has shown it is going to take a comprehensive strategy involving stakeholders at every level, and partnerships around the world, to end the flow of drugs that have such a disastrous impact on our communities. I'm confident that Gil will bring the collaborative approach needed to succeed. He is the right man for the job and the cop we need on this beat."

Open to New Ideas?

Kerlikowske promised "restoration of the vitality of ONDCP," with policy leadership built on "consensus on how to best use interdiction efforts, law enforcement, treatment, prevention, and sound research to achieve measurable results in reducing drug use and its consequences."

"Dialogue will be continuous. Debate will be inclusive of new ideas. Deliberation will be comprehensive and collaborative," said Kerlikowske.

Ethan Nadelmann, executive director of the Drug Policy Alliance, described the bulk of Kerlikowske's remarks "unexceptional" but said he was struck by the nominee's call for inclusiveness. "His comments about the need for continuous dialogue and the inclusion of new ideas represented a repudiation of ONDCP's modus operandi during the Bush administration," said Nadelmann.

"If we ask Kerlikowske about legalization, the answer is going to be no," Nadelmann acknowledged. "But at least our input will be heard. The center of the debate is moving in our direction."

Kerlikowske, the former Seattle police chief, faced few tough questions and received a heap of praise at his Senate confirmation hearing. Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) was perhaps the most aggressive questioner, peppering the nominee with queries on meth use in rural communities and on smuggling across the northern border in a parochial (though ultimately unsuccessful) attempt to get Kerlikowske to commit to directing more federal resources to upstate New York and expanding the scope of the existing New York/New Jersey High-Impact Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA).

In his responses to other questions from the panel, Kerlikowske took the opportunity to restate his commitment to breaking down the 'silos' between supply and demand reduction efforts, and strongly endorsed the concept of drug courts. He also said that ONDCP had been slow to address the emergence of methamphetamine use, which he characterized as a major problem in some communities even if not a major crisis on a national level.

Praise from the Field

Testimony submitted to the committee in advance of the hearing by a variety of addiction-related organizations, police officials, and others was universally positive. "We strongly believe that Chief Kerlikowske's extensive experience at the community level will provide him with the understanding necessary to implement critically important, effective reforms to our drug policy at the national level," wrote Paul Samuels and Becky Vaughn, leaders, respectively, of the Legal Action Center and the State Associations of Addiction Services.

"Gil Kerlikowske knows the need for action against drug-abuse deaths at home and drug supply routes abroad," wrote former Clinton drug czar Barry McCaffrey. Arthur Dean, chairman and CEO of Community Anti-Drug Coalitions of America, said that Kerlikowske is "singularly qualified to lead the nation's drug-control efforts" and "universally respected by the law enforcement, prevention, and treatment fields as a result of his steadfast work ethic, honesty, and demeanor."

"He embodies all of the attributes needed to be both an effective manager and a visionary leader, and is a fierce defender of community-policing principles that remove barriers between the criminal-justice and prevention and treatment communit[ies]," wrote Dean.  

SHARE   

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Reverendcrash on 09 Apr 09 10:18 AM EDT
Was it not the U.S.S.R that used the term CZAR! This is a slap in the Face to our Republic. Good-Bye America, all in the name of Government knows best. Pathetic!

Posted by stopthehate on 09 Apr 09 10:37 AM EDT
It is so refreshing to see the standard go back to funding science-based, proven programs, rather than what Bush did, of only funding programs that reflected right wing politics.

Posted by Phoebe on 09 Apr 09 11:32 AM EDT
Reverend Crash, I would suggest that you open a history book. The soviets overthrew and executed the czar of russia in the process of creating a modern communist state. Those who fail to learn history are doomed to spew nonsense.

Posted by Jim Paoni on 09 Apr 09 11:36 AM EDT
Reverendcrash... Not sure where you are coming from with your comment, but I disagree with your opinion that using the word is a pathetic slap in the face. Even you have used the word "Republic" (from Latin term res publica) and that's just how language evolves, no judgement of evil needed that America will soon be 'dead' like the Latin language. By the way, you are wrong about the origin of "Czar"-the origin of which is Ceasar (Roman), then Kaiser (NE Europe). In Roman , the 2nd syllable is accented, thus the pronunciation sounds like "Zar". Meanwhile, go ahead and use words like 'bridge' (card game of Russian origin), grow a 'bonsai' tree, use any product made from 'soy' beans, live in an 'adobe' house, etc., and it won't hurt our country a bit!

Posted by joe on 09 Apr 09 11:47 AM EDT
More of the same "let's stop drugs by chasing around the bad guys". Has not worked in the past will not work now. The only thing the war on drugs has worked at is funding the Marketing of drugs including the spread of drug use into grade schools. It is all so much fear based, self righteous crud! Regulate the drugs, thus eliminate billions spent on drug marketing and associated crime. Use surplus dollars for treatment.

Posted by Praetor on 10 Apr 09 12:36 PM EDT
I would have to agree with Joe, it's unfortunate we continue to pursue the same strategy in spite of its proven failure. As a recovering drug addict myself we often quote the definition of insanity as repeting the same behavior expecting different results. I would argue indeed that our government's approach to drug policy would meet this definition of insanity. While illicit drug use only accounts for less than 1/10th of the annual deaths that result from complications of obesity we still continue to treat it as the number one problem in America. Please feel free to research on your own annual deaths from obesity related health complications as well as legalized drugs i.e. tobacco and alcohol compared to illicit drugs and then make an informed decision on which of these "epidemics" is most dangerous to the general American public. I will say however I feel encouraged to see government officials stating publicly at least they will base policy around scientific evidence rather, perhaps then we may see some gradual changes instead of continuing to pursue than policies based on their individual views/religious beliefs.

Posted by Allen McQuarrie on 13 Apr 09 10:25 AM EDT
This appointment with A. Thomas Mclellan as second in command will create a new recovery era for all. Those seeking treatment, loved ones, employers and law enforcement will see progress.

Posted by Luis M. Lozano on 13 Apr 09 01:37 PM EDT
If we apply what we have learned in Colombia is that our money and our policies have created one of the most corrupt governments in latin-american and the supply has only increased as well as the violence.

Posted by CCR on 13 Apr 09 03:27 PM EDT
Actions speak louder than words. I hope the Chief is sincere in what he is saying. I disagree with his view of meth not being a national problem. Just look at the statistics, we need more prevention programs not in just the rurals areas, but in the metropolitan areas as well.

Posted by Brinna on 19 Apr 09 12:11 AM EDT
We need to remove the profit motive from the drug trade, pure and simple. How might we do that, do you think?

Posted by JD Anticoli on 19 Apr 09 10:58 PM EDT
Thank you all for some excellent heads-up discussion on the topic. Clarity informs the process when it's directed toward the truth. And the truth is, Prohibition is immoral by definition because its two main players, Drug Suppliers & Drug-Law Enforcement, operate in a vacuum. They suck in valuable national resources to serve their own ends; ends that are clearly capital. All attempts to shroud the truth in self-rightous garb like "drugs are bad" or "war on drugs" is a large part of the problem. Remember what happened in the 30's when $14 million dollars from Standard Oil's Rockefeller funded the Women's Temperance Movement effectively demonizing alcohol? We got 30,000 illegal speakeasies,the death of the alcohol-powered engine,and the birth of Gasoline. Treat the scourge of addiction like any public health problem; medicalize it. END PROHIBITION NOW!

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines