Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

It's Official: Kerlikowske to Head ONDCP, But Won't Serve in Obama's Cabinet
March 11, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Feature
by Bob Curley

Seattle Police Chief Gil Kerlikowske has been officially announced as President Barack Obama's "drug czar" by the White House, but unlike his recent predecessors, he will not serve as a member of the president's Cabinet.

"With escalating violence along our Southwest border and far too many suffering from the disease of addiction here at home, never has it been more important to have a national drug control strategy guided by sound principles of public safety and public health," said Obama in a March 11 press release. "We must demonstrate to our international partners, the criminal organizations threatening to undermine stability and the rule of law in those nations, and the American people, that we take seriously our responsibility to reduce drug use in the United States. Gil Kerlikowske has the expertise, the experience, and the sound judgment to lead our national efforts against drug trafficking and use, and he will make an excellent addition to my administration."

In a White House ceremony, Vice President Joseph Biden -- who helped create the Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) and has been a key architect of federal drug policy for decades -- said Kerlikowske "brings a lifetime of experience working on drug-policy issues. He has worked on the issue at all levels from the Department of Justice to the front lines as a major city chief. He understands that combating drugs requires a comprehensive approach that includes enforcement, prevention and treatment."

"What I find most appealing about [Kerlikowske] is that he says we can't operate in 'silos' -- with barriers thrown up between the criminal-justice system, the prevention and treatment community, and the recovery components of this problem ... He knows we need a comprehensive answer," said Biden. "And that's exactly what the vision we had in mind when we first ... created that office ... We know we needed tough laws, and we have tough laws. But that wasn't enough. We needed a balanced approach in combating drugs -- one that included prevention, treatment and enforcement."

Kerlikowske echoed Biden's call for a "coordinated comprehensive national drug strategy," stating, "For too long, we have operated ... in silence when it comes to making our country drug-free and reducing the demand for drugs. It's an incredibly complex problem, and it requires prosecutors and law enforcement, courts, treatment providers, and prevention programs to exchange information and to work together."

"The success of our efforts to reduce the flow of drugs is largely dependent on our ability to reduce demand for them," Kerlikowske continued. "And that starts with our youth. Our nation's drug problem is one of human suffering, and as a police officer but also in my own family, I have experienced the effects that drugs can have on our youth, our families and our communities." Kerlikowske's son, Jeffrey, has a criminal record that includes arrests for marijuana possession and distribution, and was arrested last week for a parole violation in Florida.

Sen. Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), a frequent critic of former drug czar John Walters, said he did not know Kerlikowske but stated: "We need a drug czar who brings credibility and accountability to ONDCP while remaining committed to the law-enforcement efforts to limit both supply and demand in the ongoing battle against drugs. I'm particularly interested to see what the nominee has to say about addressing the country's methamphetamine problem, which has had a devastating effect in Iowa and other rural states."

Demoted from Cabinet

Biden said he was "a little disappointed the last eight years [that the drug issue] hasn't gotten the attention that it should have gotten," but the Obama administration also announced this week that the ONDCP director will occupy a less prestigious position in the White House: the "drug czar" will no longer be part of the president's Cabinet, although ONDCP will remain a part of the Executive Office of the President. Administration officials insisted, however, that Kerlikowske would still have direct access to the president.

In his remarks announcing Kerlikowske's appointment, Biden said that the "drug czar" position was established because "we had 32 agencies dealing with the drug problem and not a lot of coordination."

"I believe[d] that we needed a drug czar, someone who could lead at a White House level, coordinating all our nation's drug policy, and I still believe that today," said Biden.

Kerlikowske's appointment still must be approved by the Senate. His nomination won praise from a broad range of advocates and officials, including Los Angeles Police Chief William Bratton, Partnership for a Drug-Free America President Steve Pasierb, Police Executive Research Forum President Chuck Wexler, and advocates for drug-policy reform.

Biden said that Kerlikowske would face some "daunting" challenges, including developing a comprehensive strategy for combating drug violence and trafficking along the Mexican border, breaking the cycle of drug addiction and incarceration, countering "messages in the media that present inaccurate information and glamorize the use of drugs," and mobilizing local communities to prevent youth drug use.  

SHARE   

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by quartermaster on 11 Mar 09 08:53 PM EDT
stop the drug war, and go after crank, drunks, and pill poppers. they are the cause of most violent offenses. methadone people are freaks. make cannabis legal and you free up space for the violent. take the money out and no one would want to make it. bring back the 10 dollar 4 finger bag

Posted by Alexandre Laudet on 12 Mar 09 09:15 AM EDT
The forthcoming shift in ONDCP's focus to demand reduction is very encouraging. Further, the new Czar's family exposure to the ravages of addiction bodes well for an enhanced focus on treatment that promotes recovery; that is sorely needed.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 12 Mar 09 10:16 AM EDT
Dear Quartermaster I hope you become the next Communications Director for the Marijuana Policy Project.

Posted by BfromB1P on 12 Mar 09 10:17 AM EDT
See... I don't believe we should END the WAR ON DRUGS, DRUGS being the key word. But We should end this rediculous war on marijuana... Drugs are BAD ...MMMKKKAY!? But responsible adult use of marijuana should be as tolerated, and as regulated the same as drinking. Thats just my point of view. HOPEFULLY WE WILL SEE THAT HAPPEN!

Posted by Dan D. on 12 Mar 09 10:31 AM EDT
It's time we learn from our mistakes. We need to avoid swinging from one extreme (primarily law enforcement)to the other extreme(legalization). What makes sense lies in the middle of these two extremes. We need to drop the war nomenclature and create an intelligent effort that comprehensive. This 'War' has been illogically lopsided towards law enforcment. If the ONDCP can understand that supply does not drive demand; rather demand drives supply...then we've got a chance to excel. We need a comprehensive plan that provides public education, prevention and treatment, all on an equal and balanced footing with law enforcement. This will require will and resources. I genuinely hope this is the beginning of a new and improved effort based on science and intellect.

Posted by Allen McQuarrie on 12 Mar 09 11:29 AM EDT
The relatively low regard for prevention, intervention, treatment and recovery support aided the defeat of the "drug wars" by successive "drug czars." If we always do what we always do, we will always get what we always get. Too much emphasis on penal tragedies and insufficient emphasis on recovery strategies have been too costly for too long. Change is overdue.

Posted by Joe D. From WV on 12 Mar 09 11:34 AM EDT
It is great to see an increased interest on the demand side and to have someone in the position whose family is openly affected by the disease of addiction. Also, VP Biden has been an advocate for the recovery movement for many years. Good to see him directly involved with these efforts. I hope we see a more collaborative effort than what we've experienced in the past.

Posted by Jon on 12 Mar 09 11:44 AM EDT
Wow it amazes me how many people still don't get it. trying to separate marijuana from drug is just like saying that alcohol is not a drug.... see what that has gotten us....105,000 lost annually due to alcohol and we still think that the issue is making marijuana legal...Hell the best reason not to legalize marijuana is what has happened with alcohol. Todays paper even reflects the French are proposing changing their alcohol laws.... seems we can never learn all you get with legalization is a legal drug..Duh! it is still a drug, still damaging individuals, families, businesses and communities. legalizing alcohol sure didn't stop problems for law enforcement did it? 46,000 die a year on highways due to the "legal" drug...police have to deal with each of those. Wake up Americans we are the problem.

Posted by Verde on 12 Mar 09 11:54 AM EDT
We need to step up the war on drugs, after all the years of encouraging other countries to do their part, Mexico is putting it all out on the line and now we have to buck up and clean the drug cartels out. If you want to end the war on drugs you must be for drug cartels. Spending money to keep our country from socially deteriorating any further is money well spent. I recommend we increase fines for pot possession. How about $1,000.00 for every gram you get caught with. And you were an akle bracelet on probation until your fine is paid so you can be found. Kick that around. It's nice to see that our drug czar has a son that just got popped for possession of weed. Real good! if this is not an epidemic, then what is?

Posted by Brinna on 12 Mar 09 09:35 PM EDT
We need to step up the War on Drugs???!!! Give me a break. After decades of arrests, billions upon billions of dollars wasted, millions of lives negatively impacted – and you want to step things up??? How about completely revising our approach? When has "War" ever been an answer. Drug abuse, is a public health issue. Drug use is a social issue. Neither are criminal issues. When all "drugs" were legal in the United States before 1913, there were exactly the same number of addicts that there are now. Nothing has changed in spite of our sanctimonious and moralistic approach to criminalizing behavior that "we" don't approve of. I only hope that the appointment of Kerlikowske signals a change in the lame-brained way our nation has been approaching this issue. And it's far past time.

Posted by Liberty on 15 Mar 09 05:26 PM EDT
Read up on history. Prohibition only increases demand. You can't tell kids that drugs in general are bad when our economy is largely driven by the pharmaceutical industry. We have chemicals in our brains and bodies that are almost identical to many illegal drugs, hence why the drugs work on us. It's ridiculous to be imprisoned for possessing a substance. Are any drugs really an inherent threat to an individual or society? Irresponsible use of the substances is the problem, not the existence of the substances themselves. Drugs have done good things for society too. Marijuana, for example, has inspired reflections and creations abounding, while possessing little risk to the individual. Why put someone in jail for wanting to experience something different? The drug war and its proponents are sick; they wish to prohibit experiences and thoughts which they themselves fear. Why should we all fear what you fear? If the substances themselves don't make us afraid, the legal consequences should? Let freedom ring; let people make their own mistakes and learn from them.

Posted by Liberty on 15 Mar 09 05:29 PM EDT
Anything a drug user could do to harm you is already illegal for other reasons; the drugs aren't the problem, irresponsibility is. You can't mandate responsibility. Keep trying, keep throwing people in prison. See where it'll get us. 2%+ of our adult population incarcerated, if you get your way. Oh, but that's just the tired, the poor, the huddled masses that we asked to be sent- it doesn't matter how we treat them. I'm amused that nobody here has proposed prohibiting alcohol and tobacco sales. It'd not only be fair, not to do so would be hypocritical in the most vulgar sense- one that kills. But then we're a free country, right?

Posted by Glenn&Karen on 16 Mar 09 09:21 AM EDT
Having had personal contact with Mr. Kerlikowske in the early 1970's in St. Petersburg, Fl., the change from "arrest them all" approach in those early years in drug enforcement; certainly has changed. Since it has finally hit home for him and his family, I am sorry that it took that to change his views and approach. I believe "Irresponsible" use of drugs is the key. Why not legalize drugs and tax them? [This has worked in many European countries.] This would cut down drastically on the comittment of crimes. This would be no different then having a few beers on Sunday afternoon to watch football. If someone just wanted to "relax" for a few hours in the privacy of their home, not endangering others, should't we adult Americans have that right?

Posted by Jerry Januszewski on 16 Mar 09 09:23 AM EDT
I question the assertion that incarceration is only appropriate for non-violent offenders. Our society has the right to remove people who bring harm to society. That harm can take many forms besides violence. Take Bernard Madoff for example. Is anyone seriously suggesting he should escape incarceration? A vigorous debate over the wisdom of current drug laws is healthy, but I reject the notion that prison is only for violent offenders.

Posted by Jerry Januszewski on 16 Mar 09 09:27 AM EDT
Typo on that first sentence. It should have said, "...appropriate for violent offenders." Thanks.

Posted by lisaf-breakingthecycles on 16 Mar 09 11:40 AM EDT
I'm heartened to read, "...a balanced approach in combating drugs -- one that included prevention, treatment and enforcement." An important part of prevention will be educating family members and those who work in any of the various capacities of this effort about the disease of addiction and how substance abuse can cause the chemical and structural changes in the brain that can result in the chronic relapsing brain disease of addiction.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines