Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Illinois Coalition 'Sticker Shocks' Community
May 1, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Feature
by Anindita Dasgupta

It's not often that teenagers, parents, prevention specialists, liquor retailers, and law-enforcement officials come together over the issue of underage drinking, but more than 2,000 community volunteers in Illinois recently rallied around a campaign to discourage adults from buying alcohol for kids.

Teenagers -- accompanied by adult chaperones, and with the permission of retailers -- placed hundreds of thousands of warning stickers on liquor bottles and cases of beer and wine coolers as part of Project Sticker Shock. The bright yellow stickers featured messages reminding patrons that it is illegal to provide minors with alcohol or to use a fake ID to purchase alcohol.

Project Sticker Shock volunteers visited liquor retailers in over 50 counties throughout the state as part of Alcohol Awareness Month, with many participating in "Sticker Shock Day" on April 2. The Illinois Liquor Control Commission (ILCC) provided materials for the campaign through funds from its  "Don't Be Sorry" educational program.

The ILCC asked retailers to continue displaying Project Sticker Shock materials in their stores throughout the month. "Getting this message out prior to the prom and graduation season can save lives," said ILCC Executive Director Lainie Krozel.

The concept behind the program is to change community ideas regarding underage drinking, said Ted Penesis, industry education manager at the ILCC, who spearheaded the statewide campaign. "If we're going to be changing our society's attitudes about underage drinking, we have to go after the people who are providing minors with alcohol," he said.

Penesis reached out to prevention specialists throughout the state, who in turn recruited community organizers interested in stopping underage drinking. Over 50 community organizations -- including statewide liquor distributors, law-enforcement organizations and alcohol and other drug prevention groups -- came together to participate in the Sticker Shock program.

"We want to send the message that the community does not approve of providing alcohol to minors," said Jason Blanchette, community prevention coordinator of Chestnut Health Systems, who headed up the program in Mason County. "The more we can create that image, the more we think there will be fewer who [buy alcohol for minors]."

Blanchette worked with students from Operation Snowball, an organization that focuses on leadership development for teenagers interested in leading drug-free lives. Blanchette also found student volunteers at a teen advisory group that meets at a local library.

"We want to get involved," said Alyssa Hand, an 11th grade student who participated in the Sticker Shock campaign. "We know there's a lot of underage drinking and partying out there, and somehow, we want to help [prevent] that."

Penesis and Blanchette said there was a great response to the project from the community, including members of the alcohol industry. "The retailers were insanely supportive," Blanchette said. Only one out of 11 retailers in Mason County wouldn't allow students to place materials in stores, and many store owners thanked students and adults as they left the stores, he said.

"[Underage drinking is] a problem we need to address," said Jason Hunter who owns Country General, a convenience store in Mason County. "This is a very simple thing to do. I don't know why every retailer wouldn't do it."

Working with retailers was essential to the success of the program, Penesis said. "The first step is making sure the liquor industry knows what you're trying to do; that you're not trying to hurt their industry but that you're trying to keep liquor out of minors' hands," he said. "I think people -- whether they are in the liquor industry or not -- just look at [Project Sticker Shock] as a way to keep everyone safe."

Hunter said he was not concerned with losing business from those who buy alcohol for minors. "I want to lose that business," he said. "Kids are our future and no sale is worth it. If you're worrying about losing business then you're missing the big picture."

"I think retailers are stepping up to the plate," said Jeanne Brady, who works with Citizens Against Substance Abuse in Woodford County. "They understand that we're just trying to have safer and healthier environments for kids."

Teens in Erie, Pa., started the first Sticker Shock program 13 years ago, plastering stickers at participating beer stores in three areas of the state. Maine, Michigan, New Hampshire and  Virginia following suit, with Maine passing legislation in 2005 that requires liquor establishments to display Sticker Shock posters.

Today, Maine's Sticker Shock program is still going strong. "It's great to see how it's taken on a life of its own," said Maryann Harakall, a prevention specialist with the Maine Office of Substance Abuse. The agency keeps track of the number of liquor retailers working with underage-drinking coalitions, the number of retailers actually participating in the program, and the number of stickers distributed.

While the agency manages the project, however, Harakall said community organizers and students are really the ones driving the efforts.

Volunteers in Illinois also placed Sticker Shock window decals, posters, and signs with similar messages around stores. "We wanted to put materials in permanent places so the message stays in the store," Penesis said.

Penesis said part of what the ILCC hoped to accomplish through the project was to create dialogue between parents and teenagers. "There is information about underage drinking that parents just don't know," he said. "It's a way to get the conversation started."

The project's success is being judged by the number of people exposed to the message, but Penesis hopes to work with other agencies to create more detailed outcome measures. "There was a pretty comprehensive penetration of the message, with almost 50 counties throughout the state covered," Penesis said.

Brady said that one of the major accomplishments of the campaign was that relationships were built between various entities interested in reducing underage drinking throughout the community. "I think that's what's key," she said. "At this point for this project, we need those relationships between the retailers and the rest of the community. We couldn't do this without them."

In addition to teenagers interested in reducing underage drug and alcohol use, adults from law enforcement, schools, and community boards reached out to help distribute materials. "I can't do that from an office. We need the people on the ground for that," Penesis said.

SHARE   

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Cyndi Desrosiers, CPS on 04 May 09 11:24 AM EDT
We have been successfully implementiong Project Sticker Shock in the Greater Seacoast of NH for many months now and have worked collaboratively with NH Liquor Commission, local police departments, community coalitions and youth groups to implement this program. This has been a part of our comprehensive plan following Maine's protocol. Allies in Substance Abuse Prevention

Posted by Bill Godshall on 04 May 09 11:42 AM EDT
These types of programs may make organizers feel good, but their primary impact is to alienate teens and encourage them to binge drink in the privacy of a friends car. The best ways to reduce youth binge drinking are to increase beer taxes, conduct compliance checks on alcohol retailers, restrict beer and hard liquor ads from television and sporting events heavily watched by teens, and to allow parents to teach their teenage children to drink responsibly. Unfortunately, those who run feel good PR campaigns like this one aren't truly interested in achieving their stated goal.

Posted by Det. M.C. Williams on 04 May 09 11:53 AM EDT
I have assetively enforced liquor laws throughout my 20 years in law enforcement. Combating this issue requires LE, DAs, judges, and the community working together. NM has a great law which makes it a felony to provide alcohol to anyone under 21. However, getting DAs and judges to take it seriously has been a challenge.

Posted by JBrennan on 04 May 09 12:03 PM EDT
Actually Bill, you're wrong. When I drank as a teenager I got it from adults who didn't care and then drove around with my friends drinking. Parents don't have any control of what their kids learn when other adults provide it, and parents deserve the right to decide. This campaign is effective in the ways described in the article.

Posted by Kat Allen on 04 May 09 12:26 PM EDT
I would love to hear if anyone has any experience with sticker shock campaigns that are designed to send positive messages - for example using stickers that say "99% of adults in xx County won't provide alcohol to anyone under 21" and include messages that say things like "a young person who waits until after age 21 to drink alcohol is 5x less likely to develop alcohol dependence...etc" and "thank you for caring enough about our young people to keep this out of the hands of anyone under age 21." I would like to see if a sticker shock campaign like this would be effective, and would assuage some of Bill Godshall's fears. We hope to try something like this in Franklin County, MA this summer.

Posted by Austin Montague on 04 May 09 12:43 PM EDT
Get Real Bill...Do you really think it's to 'toot our own horn' & make us feel good. Not doing anything at is what's not going to work! Maybe you didn't start drinking at age 15 and become an alcoholic for 25 years like myself, then spend 3 years in rehab's,ect breaking the chains that bound me and was killing me.I've been sober for 8+ years now & I'll fight till my last breath to help anyone,especially my own son, who states "That he was taught by the best".meaning ME......We all have a responsibility to do something to show we truly care about this world in which we live to make it a better place for our children!God Loves us all the same.

Posted by Donna on 04 May 09 01:00 PM EDT
I would think the real sign of success is measuring the amount of liquor sales for the month April in the state of Illinois. I would like to see those results because I am very curious. This is something you could actually measure easily.

Posted by Linda M. on 04 May 09 01:07 PM EDT
Parents who try to teach their children to drink "responsibly" inadvertently teach them to break the law thus promoting social irresponsibility. Teens who drink dramatically increase their odds of developing a substance use disorder and expose themselves and others to grave danger. I applaud the effort being made with sticker shock programs.

Posted by SheilaJoyce on 04 May 09 03:12 PM EDT
Fantastic !! Absolutely fantastic !! Now, if we can only get our Gov'ts to comply, bringing mandatory health warning labels on ALL liquor containers !

Posted by lisaf-breakingthecycles on 04 May 09 10:21 PM EDT
Adding to SheliaJoyce's comment -- also include the number of standard drinks per container to help consumers understand just how many drinks are in the container.

Posted by Tom B on 04 May 09 11:41 PM EDT
Bill, while I agree that most of your ideas for preventing teen drinking would help, no one can take on all of them alone. Sticker Shock is one way to attack it, and hopefully others can lead the fight on other fronts. Raising alcohol taxes would no doubt have some affect, but not nearly as much if adults are still the ones buying for underage drinkers (which many of my friends' parents did). If you decrease the availability by decreasing the number of suppliers, underage drinking will go down.

Posted by Terrance Newton on 05 May 09 09:19 AM EDT
I agree with Bill that we need to increase the tax on beer and liquor to fund programs that work to prevent underage drinking. The increased revenue also needs to be used to treat people who do develop an issue with alcohol and/or drugs. The liquor industries campaign of; "Drink Responsibly" is a joke. It implies if someone develops a problem they are nothing but irresponsible people. I also do not agree with the assessment that these youth programs do not work. They get youth involved in preventing development of a problem with alcohol. Any refusal skills we help our youth with is a positive step in being part of a multi-systemic solution.

Posted by Linda in NH on 07 May 09 09:11 AM EDT
I agree with SheilaJoyce and lisaf-breakingthecycles, we need our legislature to put the same warning labels that tobacco has and the same nutrition information that food has on all containers of digestible items, including beer/wine/spirits/liquor and whatever else its called. Then parents will not be able deny their level of responsibility. We don't even need new laws - just enforcement of the ones we have!! It's time to start the phone calls and emails and letters to our Senators and Representatives in DC!! When the entire medical, prevention and recovery communities mobilize, the Legislature will have to stop pandering to the special interests, who are currently the only ones making noise, and serve the People. Democracy works if we work it!

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines