Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

First Addiction Medicine Specialists Named
May 15, 2009

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Feature
by Bob Curley

In a major milestone for the addiction field, the American Board of Addiction Medicine (ABAM) recently named the first group of board-certified addiction-medicine specialists, recognizing 1,240 doctors who previously had been certified by the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM).

More than 100 of the "grandfathered" addiction-medicine specialists attended the ASAM annual medical-scientific meeting in New Orleans earlier this month to receive their ABAM certification in person. ABAM, formed in 2007, is the only national medical board dedicated exclusively to addiction medicine, with a mission that includes setting standards for physician education, assessing physicians' knowledge, and facilitating continuing education.

ABAM certification will be offered to physicians in Internal Medicine, Family Medicine, Obstetrics & Gynecology, Pediatrics, Emergency Medicine, Surgery, Preventive Medicine, Psychiatry, Neurology and other medical specialties. "Physicians are often at a loss for what to do about substance use and addiction issues, and may even misdiagnose the problem," said ABAM President Kevin B. Kunz, M.D. "We hope to change this by creating a cadre of thousands of specialized physicians across medical specialties."

The timing is right for standardizing and improving professional education in the field of addiction medicine, according to Kunz and others who pointed to a recent paradigm shift around addiction that has taken place in the medical community. "Over time, people have begun to recognize that this should look more like other medical specialties," said addiction researcher Richard Saitz, M.D, of the Boston University School of Medicine. "Years ago, addiction was not viewed as a health problem. In the past 10-12 years, enough people in the health community have recognized addiction as a health problem that attitudes have changed sharply."

"Years of scientific research have proven drug addiction is a brain disease caused by biological, environmental and developmental factors -- a disease which can have far-reaching medical consequences," added Nora D. Volkow, M.D., director of the National Institute on Drug Abuse. "Given the proper training, tools, and resources, physicians can be the first line of defense against substance abuse and addiction -- identifying drug use early, preventing its escalation to abuse and addiction, and referring patients in need to treatment."

"This will bring addiction as a disease the recognition that the rest of the country already has," said Kunz. "Essentially, medicine is catching up with the rest of society."

Addiction certification and specialization among M.D.s does not pose a threat to traditional counselors, Kunz stressed. "We consider ourselves partners in the total care of patients, not just prescribing meds and doing detox," he said. "We need a team approach, and addiction physicians have a very high regard for those who do tremendous work in 12-step programs."

Long-Term Plans Outlined

Kunz said that ABAM expects to grandfather a few hundred more ASAM-certified doctors before offering its first board-certification exam in 2010. The group also is working on establishing a continuing medical education (CME) program (and requirements) for certified addiction doctors. Kunz said the ultimate goal is for ABAM -- and addiction medicine -- to win recognition by the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS).

"The implications are monumental," said Saitz, who said ABMS recognition would open the door for more young doctors to choose addiction medicine as a specialty and get training, as well as encouraging medical centers to establish separate departments of addiction diseases -- which exist for all other medical specialties but not addictions, he said.

ABAM hopes to have a model residency program finalized within the next 18 months, said Kunz, and 25-50 addiction-medicine residency programs established nationwide within three years. Currently, there are no addiction medicine residencies among the 8,200 accredited residency programs in the nation's hospitals.

ASAM, which was instrumental in founding ABAM, had about 500 doctors take its certification exam last year; Kunz said he hopes to have 1,000 physicians seek ABAM certification in 2010, and that a goal of 3,000-6,000 ABAM-certified physicians within the next 8 years is not unrealistic.

"We want addiction prevention, screening, intervention and treatment to become routine aspects of medical care, available virtually any place health care is provided," Kunz said.

How many certified addiction specialists does the U.S. require to meet the needs of the population? Kunz notes that about 10 percent of the population has an addiction problem, but only 10 percent of those with addictions currently get the help they need. He compared addiction medicine to radiology, another medical specialty that cuts across multiple areas of health care, from emergency medicine to oncology; since 1935, 37,000 radiologists have been board-certified in the U.S.

"My guess is we will need at least 10,000 board-certified addiction specialists to make this work," said Kunz.

"We need the prestige and recognition of certification in order to be at the table so that our patients get the care they deserve," added Saitz. "There are a lot of things our patients put up with because of the lack of prestige and stigma. Imagine the outcry if we said that most people with breast cancer don't get treatment?"  

SHARE   

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Addiction medicine specialist program on 18 May 09 09:14 AM EDT
Thank you to ASAM for implementing this much needed program! Some of my clients report that their physicians are still telling them it is OK to drink a glass of wine during their pregnancy. Please include in your curriculum specific training on the use of psychotropic medications by pregnant/post-partum substance affected women with co-occurring mental health diagnoses. Thank you.

Posted by Kent Dean, PhD, LAC on 18 May 09 09:17 AM EDT
Now that this development is underway (and with all due respect to Dr. Kunz), perhaps it's time to begin the process of promulgating the understanding that those of us who counsel people with addictions are not doing 12-Step work. We refer our patients to 12-Step programs, but no longer do competent mental health professionals center their therapeutic approach on 12-Step work. That can be done elsewhere and for free.

Posted by Roy Baas on 18 May 09 10:19 AM EDT
It amazes me how physicians recognize how important it is to specialize in addicttion specific medicine, yet other Professional think their masters degree, with no specialized training in addictions, qualifies them to treat addictions.

Posted by Edward S. Friedrichs, M. D. on 18 May 09 11:42 AM EDT
"Certified by Exam" in the mid-90s, I probably don't qualify to be "grandfathered," but my interest continues. At the top of my priority list is the understanding of Sleep, in concert with the ad-dictive process, predeliction and therapy, poorly managed by our cur-rent psychopharmacopeia. I hope Sleep Medicine will be part of the training and examination of future Addiction Specialists.

Posted by Boogie on 18 May 09 02:11 PM EDT
This is just great, now the whole country will be pimped by another 12 step program advocate. Way to go AMA. Everyone who has ever gotten busted for drug or alcohol use better watch out, if you get busted or event those getting busted for the first time, you will be condemned to being called an "addict or alcoholic" for the rest of your life. We need people to take responsibilty for their bad behavior, not letting them get away with breaking the law by having some so called "self inflicted disease (addiction) which is clearly a personal choice" for the end user. Wake up America! Stop going along with this lie and let law enforcement handle these criminals who break the law. People who break the law should play the hand they are dealing for themselves, right up to going to jail for a long time.

Posted by Prevention specialist on 18 May 09 02:53 PM EDT
Let me guess....:) Boogie is a cop! Yeah, put all addicts in jail, that will work....You have a lot to learn dear Boogie.

Posted by Addiction Counselor for 24 years on 18 May 09 03:06 PM EDT
Boogie is probably not a "cop" but a disgruntled family member of an addict. Fortunately law enforcement professionals now recognize the disease of addiction as well as do other professions. Thank you AMA for recognizing the need for Dr.s who specialize. This needs to be a move toward less pharmaceutical intervention and better management of chronic pain and illness with alternatives.

Posted by Program Director for Substance Abusing Offenders on 18 May 09 04:46 PM EDT
Thank you AMA for realizing that our Medical Docs need to better understand the intricacies of addiction so that more people have access to accurate treatment information. While I can understand Boogie's frustration, science is proof positive that addiction is a "brain disease". I can also attest to numerous cases where addicted ex-offenders have entered into recovery from their chronic illness, rebuilt their families and thier lives, and have become very productive members of our society. Following treatment, they do have choices, and many make the right ones!

Posted by Patricia on 18 May 09 09:22 PM EDT
My grandson is a violent raging alcoholic. He has no insurance and refuses any 12-step help. Do we have to wait until he goes to prison then hope he gets the psychological help he so desperately needs. He's destroying our family!

Posted by Annie on 18 May 09 11:24 PM EDT
Boogie forgets not all addicts "break the law" and deserve the harsh treatment he describes. Alcohol is still legal for most of us and addiction to alcohol does not always lead to law enforcement "handling these criminals." I'm glad the medical community believes in positive intervention and will take the responsibility to ask the right questions in a health related environment.

Posted by R.Lambroschino-Mass DMH-MICA specialist clinical case manager on 19 May 09 10:15 AM EDT
This news is very positive.Here in metaphor is my idea for the proper medical role in treating addiction in severely mentally ill individuals,or otherwise-If you are not a Red Sox fan you'll need help getting this-the repair the doctor made to Schilling's ankle-the bloody sock event-was crucial to winning.Not manager,player,or Schilling,the doctor does not run the team.Without the doctor the team would have lost.The doctor's role in treating mental illnes AND addiction-neither really a medical condition-is that of consultant.

Posted by Boogie on 19 May 09 11:44 AM EDT
Let me clear something up something here, it seems some of you can't comprehend what I wrote. My statment says, Addiction is not a Disease and if someone breaks the law because of their bad habit jail should always be the first course of action. Lots of people have bad habits and when thier habits get out of control they seek help, privately as they privately as their bad habit. But, when someone crosses the line and get in the system, why should taxpayer funds "bail" them out. Irresponsble drunks who get behind the wheel of a a car, first time or 100th time and kills anyone should be locked up for a long time. Why should anyone who's self inflicted condiction be a defense for murder someone and getting out of jail with a "thataboy" pat on the back, "you have a disease" (Addiction) , so your disease have saved you from damnation, go get drunk again because your new philosophy is, "one day at a time" and if you kill someone else, you just fell off the wagon, we'll send you back to you cult leaders to try again and see how long you can count the days before you next drunken episode(Relapse). It's time to wake up America, enough is enough, this is the very reason we in California tax payers defeated Prop 7. We are tired of being "pimped" by all these so called Addiction Experts and Law breakers. Now it's time for the rest of America to smell the "TRUTH". Addiction is ?????(Choice) It was experts that got in this other mess! Who's checking the Experts?

Posted by Boogie on 19 May 09 12:31 PM EDT
Correction>>>>> That was Prop 5 not Prop 7

Posted by Rico on 19 May 09 02:38 PM EDT
Hey Boogie, we have been locking people up for addictions issues for years. The prison system is full of them, busting at the seams, and we keep building more prisons all the time as well as let drangerous hard core criminals out early to make more room for those with possession charges or DUI'S. My point, jail don't work. And this problems effects tens of thousand of adicts who have never been arrested not to the mention all the others who are effected, like parents, spouses , children, siblings, grandparents, society etc.....

Posted by Boogie on 19 May 09 03:58 PM EDT
My Point, you make your bed you lie in! Don't expect everyone else to pity you for making bad choices or taxpayers to fix them. As long as we continue to "lie" and "manipulate" others by giving them a pass on responsibility until after they screw up and hurt someone other than themself, what about before anything bad ever happens. If we get back to using common sense approaches or "GOD" even, which is the American awy and not some unknown "higher power" we may start to see people get on their knees and be forgiven by God, but will man ever forgive them, "NO" if they kill someone while under the influence. Yes, I do beieve more prisions are needed to be built, this is the real world. In some countries they execute you, ummm. As far as all those other people who are effected, some of them probally are encouraging the situation. Parents should be held accountable with thier underage kids if they screw up. Responsible adults have a choice, they don'y have to put up with someone else's bad habits, they are afraid, most of them, to let go! A criminal (convict) is a criminal if they have been convicted. There is only one step,"Step up and take control of your life" and you don't need a bunch of so called Addiction Experts in the field of 12 steps to get you there. Longer jail sentences on the books may change some minds before they start. And if you have never been arrested your luck maybe running out. Check yourself before you wreck yourself!

Posted by rico on 19 May 09 05:24 PM EDT
Hey Boogie, Problem is we are all lying in that bed not just the addict. Why should the tax payers pay for expensive jail stays that don't deter addictive bahavoir. If you kill someone your going to jail already,(mute point) but it is more than that, way more than that. There are countless folks with addiction issues that don't ever show up in the legal system. They are slowly killing themself in silence creating a drain on our health care system due to physical illnesses cause by addiction. That is where the doctors come into the picture to help prevent futher problems. There is just no easy answer to this problem, and throwing everyone jail mentality is not working. Ya, look at those countries That " execute you " real attractive places live, ummm, especially for Christian folks like yourself. Certifying these doctors will begin to identify addicted folks before they are arrest before they kill someone. Tax payers are going to pay one way or the other where it is treatment, jail, or health care. My vote goes to treatment.

Posted by Boogie on 19 May 09 06:09 PM EDT
If a person, under his own free will chooses to kill himself by whatever means, rather than get help for his bad habit, which he pays for, that burden is on him. Now, The jail issue is for some reason blinding because it has been designed to seperate the good folks from the bad folks. And if you break the law, that's what it is there for. Now, whith the rise in crime it's doing it job. What I'm hearing is if you get caught doing bad you should not go where bad people go. The rest of the folks who don't get caught and get help on their own once again the word "choice" is in play. But if you get busted for society "JAIL" is the choice you choose. "NO EXCUSES"

Posted by Sue on 21 May 09 07:37 AM EDT
There simply isn't enough money to afford to throw everyone in jail who breaks every law - including those who steal bread because they are hunger. We need to fix the system.

Posted by Boogie on 21 May 09 07:01 PM EDT
Our system is not designed to just throw people in JAIL, People usaully put themselves thEre by the choices they make. I would rather have all crimminals locked up for their crimes and we wouldn't have a budget shortage if we put them on work details to pay for thier stay. Jail, where I came from was called the "WORK HOUSE" umm. "NO EXCUSES"

Posted by Rico on 22 May 09 10:01 AM EDT
Hey Boobie, according to your philosophy, we should also lock people up for bad dietary and lifestyle choices. When people have heart problems, high cholesterol, high blood, diabetes, stomach problems, obesity and number of other health issues to many to list, we should just throw them in jail for not exercising and eating hot dogs, fatty meats, fast food, chips, sweets, and all the other processed and disease creating junk food. Hey, if they don't excercise or smoke cigarettes, we add add another 2 or 3 years to their sentence. Why should society have to pay for people's bad choices. These individuals' bad choices are making my insurance premiums go through the roof and draining the government (tax payer's) dollars. " NO EXCUSES"

Posted by Boogie on 22 May 09 10:53 AM EDT
I think we got off course here, I am talking about illegal substance abuse as far as people going to jail, everyone else is on thier own, although I do not believe addiction of any kind is a disease, rather it's a personal choice. And why should I, as a taxpayer, pay for someone elses treatment for the choices they make, good or bad. As it is in the news every where today. Beware of those calling themselves "experts" they are more like "guessperts" and you see where that has gotten us. Rico, you are exactly right society should not have to pay for peoples bad choices, we are not involved in their good choices.

Posted by larbacmc on 28 May 09 01:48 PM EDT
Boogie What do you think should happen to a child born to a heroin and or other drugs. They are addicts, should they be put away .

Posted by larbacmc on 28 May 09 01:58 PM EDT
Boogie Would it be better to kill the children born from mother on heroin since they are addicts and it was the mothers choice.

Posted by Boogie on 29 May 09 01:14 AM EDT
larbacmc;It has never been proven that a child born to a drug or alcohol user, as it was the myth in the 1980's about "crack babies" that these kids were addcited athough some may have had traces of the substance in thier system, depending on how recent the use was with the motherb at the time of birth. If it can be proven otherwise undisputely, I await your evidence. Your questions regarding(kill and put away) although,has me questioning your state of mind.

Posted by Boogie on 29 May 09 02:01 PM EDT
Correction: larbacmc; It should read "that these kids were "not" addicted although their mother had used" this was simply a "myth", so I say again show me evidence to the contrary if their is any available.

Posted by Shelwoy on 01 Jun 09 12:41 PM EDT
It is obvious that what we have been doing for decades is NOT working! It is time for change. And if you really think a child is not affected by their parents drug use, you are not only blind, but incapable of understanding that there is a mass of evidence to prove it.Just look up drug addicted babies online for the evidence!

Posted by Boogie on 02 Jun 09 12:08 AM EDT
There is no irrefutable proof that these babies are addicted. All the research shows is immediately after the child is born they may traces of any substance in their blood stream. Calling them "addicted" is just a ploy to get funding. So as a "scare tactic" I'm sure those in the medical research field jumped on this one. To prove their theory they would have to track the life spand of each of these so called "addicted babies" in to adulthood to offer any real proof. Good try though! Question: If a mother abuses any other substance besides drugs, say cigarettes is the baby a "nicotene addict" when it's born? I learned a long time ago as it relates to research,it all depends on who's doing the research and who's paying for the results.

Posted by Bryan on 01 Jul 09 11:29 AM EDT
I have been down this road with Boogie before. We should all take comfort his mentality is NOT where America is headed. Rico - right on! Also - I certainly don't need Boogie to explain "God". I have been prayerful about this issue for many years. The scientific evidence is very clear and mounting all the time... addiction is a brain disease. We will not win every arguement with those who wish to remain behind a brick wall of morality or choice and any educated, objective person will be the first to tell you the "experts" aren't always right. Medical discipline does not hold 100% solutions, 100% of the time, nor do I see a time in the near future that it will. The medical models loose battles to cancer, heart disease and more regularly but it doesn't mean research and development will cease. In fact, just the opposite. Addiction has a long history of being mis-understood, we shouldnt be surprised by Boogie's mindset. It's up to the industry now to unite and yes "join together". This disease should be treated by medical AND clinical professionals under a chronic disease management model. You bet Boogie, I will encourage everyone I know who suffers from this or any other disease to pray, but I will also tell them to seek professional help. This has been a long road, and we have a long way yet to go, but we must continue the journey.

Posted by Boogie on 06 Jul 09 08:31 PM EDT
While you are praying, ask for forgiveness of all those who took a drink got busted for drunk driving and is now condemned by the great 12 step (AA) programs which they should never had been sent to, but the system says, if you drink and get caught you must be an alcoholic but I don't see anyone standing up from AA or 12 step programs saying these people don't belong here. Instead let's make them pay for this disease they have now by going through this 12 (AA) program which works only to get their money and that's what's this whole "desease concept" is all about. Get Real! Only fools will believe they have a desease when they drink alcohol because otherwise what government would sell desease in mostly every store in the community, drug stores, liquor stores, corner stores, resturants, etc. get my message. Addiction is a Choice!

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines