Join Together
Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Ramstad Seen as Possible Obama Drug Czar
November 21, 2008

Share Share Email
email
Print
print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Feature
By Bob Curley

As President-elect Barack Obama's transition team gathers steam, word is leaking out that recently retired Rep. Jim Ramstad (R-Minn.) -- a strong advocate for addiction treatment and recovery -- could be in the running for the position of Obama's "drug czar."

Drugs -- and the addiction issue in general -- got very little attention during the recently concluded presidential campaign, but now that Obama has won, his duties prior to taking office on Jan. 20 include selecting candidates for some of the top positions for his forthcoming administration. And although the job of director of the White House's Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) has seemed almost invisible in recent years, in fact the "drug czar" is officially part of the president's Cabinet -- technically on par with the Attorney General, Secretary of Defense, and Secretary of State.

No candidates for the drug czar's job have been officially announced by the team running Obama's search for a successor to current ONDCP head John Walters; the search is reportedly being led by Christopher Putala, Washington, D.C., consultant and former senior Senate Judiciary Committee staffer for then-Chairman (and now vice-president elect) Joseph Biden (D-Del.); and Donald Vereen of the University of Michigan School of Public Health, a former NIH researcher and deputy ONDCP director between 1998 and 2001 under President George H.W. Bush.

The Capitol Hill newsmagazine Politico first reported that Ramstad was being considered as a possible head of ONDCP in the Obama administration. Dean Peterson, a Ramstad spokesperson, told Politico it was "gratifying to hear Jim's name being mentioned for drug czar"; however, a Ramstad spokesperson contacted by Join Together would not comment on whether the nine-term Congressman was in the running for the job.

Ramstad also appears to be under consideration as the next administrator of the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA).

More Reputed Candidates

Other potential candidates for drug czar floating around the blogosphere and Washington have included Los Angeles Police Chief William Bratton, drug-policy researcher and author Mark A. Kleiman of the UCLA School of Public Affairs, current Center for Substance Abuse Treatment director H. Wesley Clark, Kathleen Kennedy Townshend, former lieutenant governor of the state of Maryland; and Tom McLellan, Ph.D., director of the Treatment Research Institute.

However, Bratton told L.A.'s City News Service that he's not interested in the job, stating, "That is not something I am seeking, it's not something I have been approached about." Likewise, Kleiman recently posted the following to his blog: "I am not, have not been, and could not be under consideration for Drug Czar. Not only have I taken positions that make me politically radioactive, I'd also be absolutely terrible at actually doing the job, which is 10 percent thinker, 30 percent manager, and 60 percent schmoozer."

Ramstad co-founded the bipartisan Congressional Addiction, Treatment and Recovery Caucus with Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-Mass.) and has been an outspoken advocate for addiction treatment service, candid about his own recovery from alcoholism, and a driving force behind the recent passage of the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008.

Eric Goplerud, Ph.D., director of Ensuring Solutions to Alcohol Programs and a research professor at the George Washington University Department of Health Policy, said that the next drug czar needs to be someone who takes a public-health approach to drug issues, not a military one. "Ramstad would definitely have that orientation," he said. "He's inspiring; he has a broad vision of how substance use related to the issues of health and mental health in this country, and he has the credibility to work with Capitol Hill and the administration. He would be a strong leader."

However, word that Ramstad might be under consideration as Obama's drug czar has not sat well with some drug-policy reform groups. "While we applaud Rep. Ramstad for his courageous and steady support for expanding drug treatment access and improving addiction awareness, and honor his own personal and very public triumph over addiction, we have strong reservations about his candidacy for the drug-czar position," states a sign-on letter being circulated by the congressional office of the Drug Policy Alliance. "In his 28 years in the U.S. House, Rep. Ramstad has consistently opposed policies that seek to reduce drug-related harm and create common ground on polarizing issues."

The letter portrays Ramstad as being out of step with some of Obama's stated positions on drug policy, noting that the GOP Congressman voted to permanently ban federal funding for needle-exchange programs and to block federal efforts to prevent the arrest of medical-marijuana users in states where such use is legal. "We urge you to nominate for drug czar someone with a public-health background, who is committed to reducing the spread of HIV/AIDS, hepatitis C and other infectious diseases, open to systematic drug-policy reform, and able to show strong leadership on the issues you believe in," the DPF letter said.

The Qualities of a Future Leader

Peter Reuter, professor of the School of Public Policy and Department of Criminology at the University of Maryland and founder of RAND's Drug Policy Research Center, sees two key qualification for an effective drug czar under Obama: stature and substantive balance.

"The office has lacked prestige since William Bennett; though General McCaffrey was a visible public figure he did not have much standing in the senior levels of government," Reuter told Join Together. "If the new director is to be taken seriously by cabinet agencies, he or she must be sufficiently well known and respected to get phone calls returned. Without that, the director reverts to a minor budget and operational coordinator."

Added Reuter: "The major challenge for the new director is to tame the enforcement machine, initially at the federal level but then at the state level. This requires someone whose credentials will not be challenged by law enforcement but who has enough knowledge of the rest of the field to make a good case for what can be accomplished through other programs."

Goplerud said that the Whole Health Campaign, a coalition of more than 70 addiction and mental-health organizations, has been working with the Obama transition team to ensure that treatment and prevention issues are considered as appointments are made throughout the government, from the Department of Labor (which will play a role in parity implementation as well as drug-free workplace issues) to the Interior Department (which includes the Department of Indian Affairs) and the Medicaid program, which directly impacts addiction treatment for thousands of Americans.

Goplerud also had praise for Obama's nomination of former Sen. Tom Daschle as Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, noting Daschle's past work on the issue of fetal alcohol syndrome. "We will have a healthcare reform czar who knows our issues," he said.

Other announced nominations, such as Rahm Emanuel as Chief of Staff, Eric Holder as Attorney General, and even Joseph Biden as Vice President have received some criticism from drug-policy reform groups, who view the trio as "pretty aggressive drug warriors," in the words of columnist Radley Balko. Similar complaints have been aired regarding ONDCP transition team leader Donald Vereen, called a "a completely unreconstructed drug warrior" by one respected source who spoke to Join Together but did not wish to be identified by name.

SHARE   

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Donald B Parsons on 24 Nov 08 09:45 AM EST
I think I could support someone who wants to wage a TRUE and FAIR "WAR ON DRUGS" and not suppress the will of "WE THE PEOPLE". State after state voters are VOTING overwhelmingly FOR access to MEDICINAL CANNABIS so I ask "WHY IS CANNABIS THE FRONT ON THIS WAR?" With ALL the drugs out there that are REAL KILLERS ( illicit or prescription ) and have killed BILLIONS over the years( tobacco & alcohol included ) the war continues to focus on the ONE drug that has directly killed NONE. The big arguement is THE KIDS and the GATEWAY THEORY which is the Drug Czars fault for LYING to the youth and saying that marijuana is just as dangerous as heroin. The MAIN reason that marijuana is the front on the war is the sheer numbers that have been incarcerated due to minor possesion charges. Without marijuana being in the mix their numbers would NOT justify the overcrowding of our prisons and their budget would surely be cut.. ITS ALL ABOUT THE NUMBERS. and without marijuana they wouldn't be near a million a year maybe 20,000.

Posted by Karen Dodge on 24 Nov 08 10:29 AM EST
You need someone who understands the nature addiction and has a commitment to educating the public, not punishing them. Until we recognize alcohol as the drug of choice most abused and recognize drug use as a health issue, we will not see any significant changes in the collateral damage addiction creates. Donald Parsons comments are sadly indicative of how much work work needs to done. Our prisons are not over crowded because of marijuana use and to say so is irresponsible. Addiction is a HEALTH issue, not a political issue.

Posted by Steve Coulter, MD on 24 Nov 08 11:01 AM EST
The choice of ONDCP chief ("Drug Czar") is of great interest to many users of this site. Further discussion of Ramstad's credentials (and lack thereof, both) by Maia Szalavitz can be found here: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/maia-szalavitz/obama-drug-czar-pick-no-r_b_145461.html Ramstad's history is a mix of both some encouraging stances in opposition to the criminal justice approach to drugs, as well as discouraging, ideologically-driven stances on public health and medical issues. The idea, though, that the Drug Czar must be some celebrity to be able to "get phone calls returned" is absurd. Who wouldn't return a call from the US Drug Czar, even if the person were some previously unknown (but qualified and competent) individual? This policy post should be filled by someone with academic credentials, not political, law enforcement, or "celebrity" credentials.

Posted by Micki Fuhrman on 24 Nov 08 11:38 AM EST
Not only do we need someone who understands addiction, but we need someone who believes in and supports prevention. Dealing with addiction and use only, is like shutting the barn door after the horse is out.

Posted by TB in Kansas on 24 Nov 08 11:52 AM EST
Weed has become more intense than in recent years. The $ alone going back and forth to Mexico is astounding. Why go after it?? Why not? The prisons are crowded by people who may have an initial charge of possession or sale and some have likely reoffended or failed to complete probation because of +UA or have continued to sale, process, or traffic. A drug is a drug is a drug....if people die because of the money attached to it, then it is a killer drug.Why not make it mandatory to attend treatment in the prison and after they get out. Educate prarole officers and probation officers about addiction. Many of them don't realize there clients are addicted......... I welcome a new perspective on addiction and recovery in the White House.

Posted by Q. L. Howard on 24 Nov 08 12:24 PM EST
It is going to be crucial to the transitions in our society that the Drug Czar and Obama Administration understand the importance of ATOD prevention education with our youth, and more emphasis should be placed on "engaging the family". I hope that this administration will exert more energy with finding out how to protect-empower the single parents who are competing with high-crime rate neighborhoods, poverty, gang activity, etc. for the attention of their teenagers.

Posted by Roger Morgan on 24 Nov 08 12:29 PM EST
Let us hope that whoever is the next Drug Czar that he/she, and the President, will observe that PREVENTION of substance abuse is the key. Since almost all addiction starts with kids, we must do all possible to defer the onset of the disease until they reach adulthood, when physiologically they are out of danger. We cannot continue to spend 99% of our resources shoveling up the damage and treating the wounded, and expect a differnt result. This is a $500 billion a year problem, that could be largely corrected by mandating non-punitive random drug testing for all students so we keep kids in the system through high school graduation. 80% of prison inmates are high school drop outs. According to a recent UC Santa Barbara study, the average drop out costs taxpayers $365,000, and there are 1.2 million drop outs annually in America ... $438 billion (annually). Dumb! We must focus on prevention.

Posted by greg williams, memphis,TN on 24 Nov 08 01:12 PM EST
Do not legalize marijuana.I have been in the treatment field for years and client after client stated that they began their long term drug use history by first smoking marijuana. Treatment and prevention efforts work. We need to remove the negative stigma associated with drug addiction and mental illness and increase the funding for prevention and treatment.

Posted by april, UT on 24 Nov 08 01:23 PM EST
The paragraph stating that we need someone who will approach the issue from a public-health standpoint and not a military one, is crap! Our military today is facing huge addiction problems! Post-deployment Service Members are using chemicals as an escape from both life and the horrors or war. Prevention and treatment are the keys to alleviating the problem.

Posted by Dawn from California on 24 Nov 08 01:42 PM EST
Let us hope that Ramstad is under consideration as Drug Czar. Let us also hope that the Drug Policy Alliance and others who are well funded by international billionaires to LEGALIZE drugs under the guise of purporting to reduce harms associated with drug use are not taken seriously in DC. The ONDCP needs to keep prevention and enforcement as a priority for the good of our Nation. JT readers should know that California continues to win the battle over the ruse of marijuana as medicinal despite efforts of the DPA. Recently many marijuana dispensaries (stores offering the retail sale of marijuana to anyone) have shut down and dispensary operators have plead guilty to drug trafficking. Why do we spend resources on marijuana – because it remains a popular drug of choice for youth who perceive it as harmless due to Prop 215 in Ca. and now Measure 2 in Ma. Why should we care? Cannabis is the dominant illicit drug in EVERY region of the world and its use is growing. Cannabis drives the international drug trade. An estimated 9% of users who try MJ become addicted. Yes, let us hope that the incoming Drug Czar has Prevention, Education and Enforcement as a priority.

Posted by Robairr on 24 Nov 08 02:25 PM EST
Obama needs to appoint someone who sees that the "War on Drugs" has failed, and can never be won. Drugs can't surrender. And the best way to measure the effectiveness of this war is not to look at drug USE rates but to look at drug ABUSE rates and the harm this causes. Abuse and use are not the same; anyone who has a glass of beer or wine on occasion but isn't black-out smashed every night knows this. Drug War proponents point to minor fluctuations in marijuana use as a basis for their claims, meanwhile drug overdoses have increased by 540 percent since 1980, and HIV/AIDS rates in cites without needle-exchange sites are soaring. Our prisons are overcrowded with people who need help, and everyone is paying for it. We need a drug czar who will reduce the harm of drugs and the harm of the Drug War. Let's stop moralizing and criminalizing and talk about drug addiction for what it is: a public health crisis. Throwing someone in jail for doing drugs will ruin their life. Helping someone find treatment might save it.

Posted by Brinna Nanda on 24 Nov 08 03:10 PM EST
Response to drug use must be science based. By removing cannabis from the WOD equation, we can focus on the real killers: heroin, meth, prescription drugs, crack and cocaine. Regulate and educate with regard to cannabis. Reach out to, and treat users of the truly addictive drugs. Use law enforcement to make sure that authorized vendors are responsible and held accountable. Simple.

Posted by John French on 24 Nov 08 05:34 PM EST
Anything will be better than what we have.

Posted by Gregory Haines, MD on 25 Nov 08 12:12 AM EST
I am addiction medicine specialist and a vocal advocate for my patients and for treatment of drug and alcohol abuse. I hope that the momentum begun by the parity act continues and we begin to focus as a nation on the treatment of substance abuse rather than control and punishment. Accepted statistics show that currently of every dollar spent due to substance abuse in this country, 96 cents goes towards enforcement and punishment and only 4 cents towards treatment. Additionally it is also accepted that for every dollar spent on treatment, seven to twelve dollars are saved in public funds that would not be spent on police, courts, and imprisonment (the seven dollars) as well as savings on health care costs, lost productivity, and the like. Once we can get past stigma and prejudice, truly significant progress can be made in the treatment of this disease. I hope whoever becomes the drug czar recognizes this and promotes understanding and treatment over fear, prejudice and punishment.

Posted by nanette on 25 Nov 08 02:27 AM EST
Hopefully along with a new President and elected officals there will be a stop put to the hate.orgs that have popped up out of guilt of loosing loved ones. MAMA.mama.org and harmd.org are lying to congress the local governments and all the way to Washington. Quoting lies.Wishing horrible deaths to patients on MAT who are part of the ADA. These groups are dangerous. They threaten the best the world has to offer in treatment programs. They are to treatment as the KKK was to the African Americans years ago.PLEASE stop their hate roups

Posted by don on 26 Nov 08 04:09 PM EST
A couple of perspectives on hoping and wishing in regard to a new Drug Czar. I must acknowledge that I have concerns about the appointment of a recovered (ing) person. As a recovered person myself, I went to work in DC in 1971 heading up part of the Hughes Act in Federal agencies. A recovered person in key slots has to overcome the "do-gooder" syndrome. Better to have a person with an in-depth broad knowledge of the world of alcohol/drug issues and the respect that comes from a solid scientific background. In addition, I know few recovered folks that do not carry a distinct bias toward the path of recovery that worked for them. And biases are the last thing we need in this position. I know several folks that are recovered with doctorate level accomplishments. Some of them are in SMART Recovery. How will the 12 Step world respond to an appointment of one of them? Virtually all those who have served in the position of Drug Czar have lacked the scientific background and have gladly donned the role of Chief Drug Warrior. We don't need that nor do we need the Chief Alcohol/Drug Stepper in that role. Don

Posted by John Q. Public on 02 Dec 08 07:45 PM EST
If ONDCP was a victim of Obama's "Scalpel" approach to government cuts - no one would even notice, and many would actually applaud - ONDCP is a COMPLETELY WORTHLESS and woefully disrespected government (or should I say unqualified Bush political cronie haven) entity. The office could be run by a maximum of five people. Get rid of it!

Posted by Sean A @ Stonehill College on 04 Dec 08 04:49 PM EST
I think it is obvious the "War on Drugs" of the 80s and 90s has been a failure and a huge waste of money. The next Drug Czar of the United States should drastically cut back the War on Drugs which for the most part is a war on the citzens of the United States. The next person in this office should shift the focus to two important issues. The first is the prevention of drug use, preventing drug use should be through programs that aim to help and identify people with personal problems before they turn to drugs. Second there needs to be approachable and free drug treatment to those that are already adicted to drugs. The only way we can win the drug war is to help and treat the citizens of this country so they can stay away from drugs rather than making them criminals.

Posted by nikki on 06 Dec 08 04:50 PM EST
want to do something about this selection? mental health and substance use professionals are signing onto an open letter to obama regarding the selection of our next drug czar...http://www.andrewtatarsky.com/phpPETITION/index.html

Posted by WayneS@Stonehill on 07 Dec 08 10:33 PM EST
The most important thing the new drug czar needs to do is focus on the prevention approach to drug use rather than the treatment approach. Trying to prevent addiction before it starts can not only benefit the individual but also society by reducing the risks that some of these potential addicts pose to others when intoxicated. Harm reduction is also very important because it helps save lives of men and women who may be at risk of getting HIV. Needle exchange is a great program and should be expanded in order to give more individuals who would otherwise get HIV a second chance at life.

Posted by Jerry Daley on 10 Dec 08 06:38 PM EST
Mr. Parsons' comments (below) are patently riddiculous. In Philadelphia, we certainly do not incarcerate persons for misdemeanor marijuana possession. Arrest & send to drug-court, yes; jail - no. As for "overwhelming" votes for medicinal marijuana, only two states (Mass. & Michigan) approved medicinal marijuana initiatives this year, while Cal. voters rejected further loosening from that already done by Prop 215. A total of 16 states now have some form of "medical marijuana" relaxation of posession law, and many communities regret it. Local ordinances are being adopted in California cities & towns banning "cannibas dispensaries" becasue of the clear ruse they pose for drug dealing. Not only the law enforcement community objects to medical marijuana initiatives; so does the public health community: the Food and Drug Administration, American Medical Association, and the Mayo Clinic have come out against smoked marijuana for theraputic needs. Notes drug policy adivisor Kevin A. Sabet PhD: "smoking a drug as volatile and unstable as marijuana is like chewing on willow bark to partake in the benefits of aspirin." In other words, dumb. Parsons' assertations lack credulity.

Posted by mary, Nebraska on 30 Dec 08 05:46 PM EST
I believe it is important that we up the anne on treatment and open the doors to the world again for people in recovery. There is such a stigma about people in recovery they can't get jobs or find a real life again. The veiw that is taken now causes so many to lose out on what life has to offer. Sure there has been many mistakes made let's learn from them and grow for a better world unit as all.

Posted by Skip on 06 Jan 09 02:01 AM EST
I am a RECOVERED drug & Alcohol addict and I would like to help men recover.I own a Sober Living home in L.A.,Ca.(Mother Hubbard's Sober Living at www.motherhubbardssoberliving.com),but more importantly I volunteer on Skid Row in L.A. How can I help?

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Submissions are held for review and approval.
Please read the guidelines before posting.

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

Guidelines for comments