Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Parity Bill Passed by U.S. House of Representatives
March 6, 2008

Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Feature
By Bob Curley

In a major victory for addiction treatment and recovery advocates, the U.S. House of Representatives has passed a bill that would mandate that insurers cover addiction and mental illness on par with other illnesses.

"We've waited 12 long years for this historic day," said Rep. Jim Ramstad (R-Minn.), co-chair of the Congressional Addiction, Treatment and Recovery Caucus with Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.). "I am grateful that the House has taken this important step to end the discrimination against people who need treatment for mental illness and chemical addiction." Ramstad, who is retiring from the House, cosponsored the parity bill with Kennedy, who said he hoped passage of the legislation "will help to erase the stigma associated with mental illness and substance abuse."

The House voted 268 to 148 in favor of H.R. 1424, the Paul Wellstone Mental Health and Addiction Equity Act, rebuffing attempts to substitute a version of parity legislation previously approved by the Senate generally considered by advocates to be weaker than the House legislation. The House bill received critical support from Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who appeared at a pre-vote rally on the steps of the Capitol and spoke in favor of the measure during the floor debate on March 5. Pelosi said that ensuring that Americans have equal access to addiction and mental-health treatment has economic benefits and also would benefit returning veterans.

"Illness of the brain must be treated like illness anywhere else in the body," said Pelosi, who called the Wellstone Act "a comprehensive bill to help end discrimination against those who seek treatment for mental illness."

Parity supporters sought -- and received -- a strong bipartisan vote in favor of the bill to back their case for adoption of the House legislation in negotiations with the Senate, which passed the Mental Health Parity Act of 2007 by unanimous consent on Sept. 18. 2007.

Congress Needs Meeting of Minds

The two houses of Congress will now need to meet and reach a compromise on parity if the legislation is to move swiftly toward a vote in a legislative calendar shortened by the presidential election season.

"The Paul Wellstone Mental Health and Addiction Equity Act of 2007 is the right solution to ending insurance discrimination facing people with alcohol and drug problems and their families," said Merlyn Karst, chair of the Faces & Voices of Recovery Board of Directors. "We urge the Congress to come together and hammer out the differences between the strong bill that the House passed today and the Senate-passed version of the parity legislation, S. 558."

Pat Taylor, executive director of Faces and Voices of Recovery, said that while there are "significant differences" between the two bills, "we think they can be worked out." Unlike the Senate bill, for example, the House legislation requires that out-of-plan addiction and mental-health treatment be covered by insurers if plans do so for other illnesses, and that insurers include coverage of all illnesses listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), the "bible" of the mental-health field. That's the same standard used in the Federal Employees Health Benefits Plan.

"I think we may have some Senate Democrats who had supported the Senate bill now come out in support of the House bill," said Dave Wellstone, son of the late senator from Minnesota and a parity advocate for the group Wellstone Action. Wellstone predicted that Congress would reach a compromise on parity that "looks a little more like the House bill" than the current Senate legislation. "There are better patient protections in the House bill and the costs are the same, so there's no need, in my mind, to pass a weaker bill just because that's what insurers want," he said.

The Bush administration, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, and some health insurers are among the opponents of the House legislation, although Bush has not threatened to veto the measure. The trade group America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) has supported the Senate bill, sponsored by Sens. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.) and Pete Dominici (R-N.M.) but not the House bill.

"Health insurance plans support the bipartisan mental-health parity legislation (S. 558) that passed the Senate by unanimous consent because it is a balanced approach that would preserve access to health plans' medical management and quality improvement programs," said Karen Ignagni, president and CEO of AHIP. "Unfortunately, the House legislation would turn back the clock on advances in the quality of care and impose excessive costs on patients and employers. Though well-intentioned, this legislation would undermine the progress that has been achieved in improving behavioral-health benefits through coordinated-care strategies."


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Karyn Cowherd on 12 Mar 08 12:40 AM EDT
To Elena from NY. Your "managed care professional" mentality needs to be corrected. I believe that is exactly what's happening. Please excuse my frank comment but any insurance provider who thinks, "Next thing, there will be expensive 28 day in-patient programs for treatment of nicotine abuse." needs to be called down for making such a negative, blatant, insulting and ill-informed remark. Hey, I think that is exactly what else is happening here thanks to "The Paul Wellstone Mental Health and Addiction Equity Act of 2007 being (is) the right solution to ending insurance discrimination facing people with alcohol and drug problems and their families,".

Posted by Lisa Cincinnati OH on 11 Mar 08 08:25 AM EDT
This needs to take effect quickly. I see the devastation daily of SA and Mental illness. I see people go into so much debt to get help becasue insurance companies limit sessions to 20 visits or less a year. How can a person recover from major depression, bi-polar ect in 20 visits? It takes monthly visits at times to control high blood pressure. Mental illness can kill as much as high blood pressure. Please pass this bill and force insurance companies to abide by the house bill without pricing the consumer out of coverage.

Posted by carolyn on 10 Mar 08 06:00 PM EDT
Access to appropriate out patient treatment for MH and SA is MUCH cheaper than repeated hospital admissions which result when folks have no services available. I've seen it over and over again.

Posted by Kathy on 10 Mar 08 11:31 AM EDT
Here's my concern. Will the insurance companies recognize and reimburse for our alcohol/drug licenses or will they continue to mandate other licenses, such as that of licensed social worker (without LADC) before reimbursing for substance abuse services.

Posted by Lisa Dyson from Durango, Colorado on 10 Mar 08 11:02 AM EDT
I was thrilled to see this has passed. As a member of the recovery community this is more of a gift then you can know. Let's hope the senate will back this completely. This is a milestone for our community. Thank to to Jim Ramstad and Patrick Kennedy as well as Nancy Pelosi. Addiction is causing widespread issues from the age of 12 through late adulthood. Let's help eradicate this disease and nuture a healthy United States

Posted by AnnMarie on 08 Mar 08 03:14 PM EST
Since business and government fed people nicotine as a socially acceptable behavior, and never indicated that nicotine destroys the lungs silently and slowly, I think insurance companies (business) should come together and help those of use QUIT SMOKING before it kills us, like it did my mother, father, brother and husband!

Posted by Elena from New York on 08 Mar 08 12:23 PM EST
The House bill requiring coverage for all DSM-IV diagnoses could force insurance companies to eliminate the behavioral health benefit completely. Coverage for behavioral health is not required by law. Or, the benefit could be limited to just a few visits per year. A better way to go is to require full coverage for major mental illnesses, like schizophrenia, bi-polar disorder, ADHD, substance dependence, major depression, eating disorder - and some others which are life threatening or seriously affect quality of life.

Posted by Elena from New York on 08 Mar 08 12:10 PM EST
Requiring insurance payment for all DSM-IV diagnoses may be the path to elimination of all behavioral health benefits due to excess costs. In other words, if everything must be covered, then insurance companies might completely eliminate behavioral health coverage from the health insurance benefit package. Maintaining medical management and quality assurance keeps the benefit intact. As a managed care professional, I have seen companies restrict or reduce the benefit to control utilization costs. Yes, they might have to cover every diagnosis, but with a limited benefit of 10 or 20 visits per year. Once the benefit is exhausted, there is no help. An example is the "nicotine abuse" cited in a comment, above. Next thing, there will be expensive 28 day in-patient programs for treatment of nicotine abuse. (It's a DSM-IV diagnosis.) People with major mental illnesses will not get the help they need with the House bill. Requiring full coverage for serious mental illness is a better way to go. (examples of major mental illness are schizophrenia, bi-polar disorder, ADHD, major depression, drug dependence, others)

Posted by Nanette on 08 Mar 08 07:01 AM EST
Finally At last some progress is being made to help the individuals who have been left out for so long!

Posted by Margie Derozier on 07 Mar 08 05:14 PM EST
Finally!!! How wonderful. Hats off to everyone who helped. Reps. Ramstad and Kennedy. Thank you to the late Sen. Paul Wellstone--we finally did it. You are definately here in spirit.

Posted by Joanne Gartenmann on 07 Mar 08 02:18 PM EST
I'm also delighted that this version passed with a VERY respectable margin, and many thanks to all the organizations which "joined together" to achieve this result. It would be a service to all following the Join Together messages if there could be a way to swiftly learn your Representative's vote on the measure and write to him/her accordingly. Thank you again.

Posted by Mac McAdams from Dallas on 07 Mar 08 12:09 PM EST
As a provider of mental health services, including chemical dependency, I see this as the most positive event that congress has done for mental health in decades. Let's keep both houses reminded that we need that compromise, and a presidential signature!

Posted by Richard Buckman- Long Island Recovery Association on 07 Mar 08 11:10 AM EST
Historic achievement; all the hard work has gotten us to this point Now all of us must stay the course to ensure that under no circumstances can we allow the senate provision that lets insurance companies dictate what gets covered to succeed. Lets hammer this point home everywhere we can. Great job with more to do.

Posted by Barbara on 07 Mar 08 11:04 AM EST
What wonderful news, and thanks to Faces and Voices of Recovery for their tireless efforts.

Posted by Jerry Clevenger Dept. of Veterans Affairs on 07 Mar 08 07:36 AM EST
The passing of this bill is great news. Now we need to somehow insure that the opportunity is not abused by folks who may be "treatment program hoppers".

Posted by Hal from Kansas on 07 Mar 08 12:03 AM EST
This is a tremendous triumph in history for caring providers and for the afflicted human beings and their families members with substance abuse/dependence and or mental health disorders. Now it's time to pray and continue to push for congress to make this a law.

Posted by Linda on 06 Mar 08 06:40 PM EST
If any of these politicians had to help their child through recovery and understood that the addiction was because of genetic issues, they would see that this is not a choice that children make, it is an illness they have to live with their whole life. If they don't get help early on, society will may for the destruction their life can cause if left untreated - at a much higher cost.

Posted by Ronald B. Brinn on 06 Mar 08 06:00 PM EST
Kudos to Congress! Now let's be sure that parity doesn't get killed by providers who don't know or care to know about addiction. Beware of "Mangled Care"...very expensive and even more ineffective.

Posted by Pat on 06 Mar 08 05:05 PM EST
This is a step forward. Thanks to Rep. Ranstad and Kennedy. Addiction is a disease and should be treated as such. Victims should receive treatment and not be criminalized.

Posted by Wendy on 06 Mar 08 04:26 PM EST
At last! It's time to stop dividing the human body and our health into separate entities and treat us as whole beings! As for insurance rates going up, prevention saves many more dollars than it costs. Nicotene treatment is much less costly than cancer treatment and mental health treatment is much less costly than putting people in prisons or mental institutions.

Posted by John fron Oceanside on 06 Mar 08 04:25 PM EST
AOD treatment in the 80's was covered by insurance. What happened is every hospital had a CD unit, and it was a huge money maker. What ended up happining is they priced themselves out of the market. I know of an insurance company who was billed $80,000 for 28 days. With those kind of numbers they wouldn't stay in business for long. I sure hope the Medical Model Units don't get greedy again. That's almost $3000.00 a bed day, for doing the same thing modified Social Model units do for $40.00 a day for in-patient services.

Posted by ddbeach on 06 Mar 08 03:43 PM EST
I'm glad it looks like this is finally happening. However, all who have gripped about your 25-30% increase in insurance rates be warned. This will assure that you will have another huge increase in your premiums.

Posted by Gene Plank on 06 Mar 08 03:29 PM EST
Thanks to all of the 'Yes' votes. Now we need to help the others understand.

Posted by Larry T on 06 Mar 08 03:25 PM EST
Regarding Viviane's question, nicotine dependence is a substance use disorder listed in the DSM IV. Treatment for that will be covered by insurance if this bill becomes law.

Posted by SarahB on 06 Mar 08 02:53 PM EST
Thank goodness! This legislation is a double-blessing: More people will be able to obtain treatment AND the stigma faced by recovering addicts (such as myself) will hopefully lessen. Now, onward to the compromise bill!

Posted by Andy Lujan, A Lujan Recovery Programs Inc. on 06 Mar 08 02:43 PM EST
We as providers thanks our legislators for doing the right thing for their constituents."The working class of America"

Posted by Leroy Kelly from Mass. on 06 Mar 08 02:38 PM EST
We must be grateful to Rep Ramstad and Kennedy and the entire Caucus for going up against this powerful lobby and achieving this victory. Now our children may have access to treatment.

Posted by David Llewellyn on 06 Mar 08 02:19 PM EST
While this is a big step toward providing important benefits to millions of Americans, there remains significant opposition by vested interests in the status quo, namely insurers and influential politicians beholden to them. Now is the time to thank our representatives who supported this effort and to urge senators and the president to pass a meaningful version. Keep calling and writing!

Posted by Join Together on 06 Mar 08 02:16 PM EST
Dorothy, I suggest signing up for email updates from Faces and Voices of Recovery. They'll keep you informed about the status of the compromise bill. -- Eric Helmuth, Join Together.

Posted by Cindy from Michigan on 06 Mar 08 02:12 PM EST
I am thrilled to hear this news! We must not give up the fight and get the Senate to fully support this bill.

Posted by Jenny on 06 Mar 08 02:10 PM EST
Start contacting your senators now and urge them to support THIS bill when the 2 houses meet.

Posted by Viviane McKay on 06 Mar 08 02:05 PM EST
Does "substance abuse" include nicotine? Does anyone know? Thanks - V

Posted by Sam Albert on 06 Mar 08 01:55 PM EST
Finally!! This is so long over due.

Posted by Dorothy on 06 Mar 08 01:53 PM EST
What can be done to influence the compromise bill?

Posted by J. C. on 06 Mar 08 01:30 PM EST
Fantastic! It's about time...now to get the Senate on board!

Your Turn! Post a public comment (guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word: Change

GUIDELINES:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, non-commercial, and on-topic.

  2. Please do not post personal requests for help or personal contact information (Click here for help resources).

  3. Proof your comments carefully. They are published immediately and cannot be edited by you or by us.

  4. Making your post readable with careful spelling and punctuation will strengthen your point.  Don't use ALL CAPS.

We reserve the right to remove comments that do not conform to these guidelines (Report an inappropriate comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.