Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

OSI Offers $10 Million for 'Closing the Addiction Treatment Gap'
February 13, 2008

Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Feature
By Bob Curley

George Soros' Open Society Institute (OSI) has announced the availability of $10 million in grants to communities seeking systemic changes to provide treatment on demand for individuals with alcohol and other drug problems.

The Closing the Addiction Treatment Gap initiative "is designed to create an awareness of -- and increase resources to close -- an alarming treatment gap: currently, four out of five Americans who need drug and alcohol addiction treatment are unable to get it," according to OSI. "The initiative aims to mobilize public support for expanded treatment by increasing public funding, broadening insurance coverage, and achieving greater program efficiency."

"The basic intent is assuring equal access to institutions and services by all people," said Victor A. Capoccia, Ph.D., head of OSI's Baltimore office, which pioneered the project as part of its Tackling Drug Addiction program area. Grants of up to $600,000 will be awarded to "multi-stakeholder partnerships in jurisdictions at the state, county or city level," according to the program announcement.

Activities that may be supported under the grants include information gathering and dissemination, communications, and public-policy advocacy. Projects in the half-dozen or more communities chosen to participate in Closing the Addiction Treatment Gap initiative will be expected to develop and advance specific solutions to systemic problems that prevent delivery of treatment services.

For example, in places like Massachusetts -- which has a universal healthcare program in place -- funding could be used to push for inclusion of addiction as a basic benefit, said Capoccia, while in states without universal healthcare the priority might be getting the legislature to increase appropriations for treatment. Insurance reform also could be a target for education and advocacy efforts, he said.

"I don't think policymakers understand the implications of the fact that private funding for treatment has declined and public funding has increased," said Capoccia. "I don't think people who are working on policies and procedures for the uninsured understand that part of this cost-shifting impacts universal healthcare" when untreated addictions land individuals in hospital emergency rooms and beds. "The inclusion of addiction benefits in health plans can avoid these hospitalizations," he noted.

Capoccia stressed that no funding under the Closing the Addiction Treatment Gap program will be used for providing treatment services. "The $10 million, in terms of providing services, is a drop in the bucket," he said. "We want to use the money to call attention to this issue and mobilize communities."

"We have a system that, at least in part, knows how to deliver the right kind of services, but not enough of it, so let's try to do more," summarized Capoccia.

Critics have often branded Soros and OSI as supporters of drug legalization based on their past funding support for groups like the Drug Policy Foundation. Capoccia -- who formerly led the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's addiction treatment and prevention program area -- said it would be a mistake to associate the Closing the Addiction Treatment Gap program with drug-legalization groups. On the other hand, he noted, "Harm-reduction has always been a part of the continuum of care."

Asked if Closing the Treatment Gap constituted an effort by Soros and OSI to tackle addiction issues in a more "mainstream" fashion, Capoccia replied, "This is not a departure at all from the investments OSI and Soros have made, but rather an extension," adding: "It's mainstream on the one hand but radical on the other -- that everyone who needs treatment should have it. We've accepted things like waiting lists ... the radical dimension is that we should be accepting that."

RWJF's 2006 decision to end its addiction-related program area has left a substantial funding gap in the treatment and prevention community, but Capoccia said that OSI's intention is not to fill RWJF's shoes. "This is not a definition of new priorities for OSI," he stated. "This is more likely to be a focused effort."

For full details on the Closing the Treatment Gap initiative, see the program website or contact Closing the Addiction Treatment Gap, 201 North Charles Street, Suite 1300, Baltimore, MD 21201; 410-234-1091.


COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Sheryl Letzgus McGinnis on 19 Feb 08 09:54 PM EST
Brilliant Roberta! Although on the surface that sounds funny, but sadly it's so true. The money needs to go where it is absolutely needed and cut the bureaucratic paperwork. Every day that people get denied or ignored who want to help addicted people, is another day that people are dying. We need to cut the bureaucracy and get serious about the business of helping. We can't afford the luxury of waiting, only to be denied much needed help. My deceased son, who was an RN, was amazed at the amount of paperwork that had to be done, which took time away from his patients. Something is very wrong with this picture. We all need to speak out to get the ball really rolling on addiction treatment. Sheryl Letzgus McGinnis,Author I Am Your Disease (The Many Faces of Addiction)

Posted by Shari Bradstream on 14 Feb 08 02:10 PM EST
I have to agree with Garrett's comment on "...put...money in the hands of treatment providers." The paperwork for allotting money for funding treatment programming is extensive and I understand the reasons for that. What I would like to see is for this $10 million to be placed in the hands of those who are already on the "frontline" because what they are doing is working! You see the data and it is well known that the gap areas and small rural communities need qualified agents of change and could use the investment of that money to train and certify Chemical Dependency professionals to serve the needs of their communities. Our prevention teams are giving us the access, what we need to augment prevention efforts is the support of "focused" administrations to redirect the money to prevention services and the treatment agency efforts that are already in progress. I believe that you can do it. We are all in the business of change... Thank you.

Posted by Roberta Garrett on 14 Feb 08 12:15 PM EST
Oh Great another $10 million to spend on "solutions" when the solution is to quit spending millions on studies and administration and put some money in the hands of treatment providers. Many small towns have local people who are desperately trying to help their addicted community members and they continue to hit the wall of, "sorry, you must be a preferred provider and to be a preferred provider you must fill out this manual of paperwork and spend XXX amount of dollars to gain the credibility of your state agency and oh by the way you aren't qualified to be helping people so we won't allow it. But you could write a grant to tell us what you should be doing about this problem! We will take it under advisement and perhaps then we will know what to tell you to do. I doubt we will have the money to do it because we must fund another search for the solution.

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for everyone, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, focused, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post personal requests for help or general promotions for your organization (Get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.