Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here

take action
For every $1 states spend dollar sign on substance misuse and addiction, 94 cents go to shovel up the consequences instead of for treatment and prevention. TELL YOUR LEGISLATORS

What Can I Do?



Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE

Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP

 

Democratic, Republican Platforms Endorse Parity, Drug Courts
September 16, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Feature
By Bob Curley

The platforms adopted by the Democratic and Republican parties at their recent conventions both signal support for some form of mental-health parity legislation, preventative health services, and alternatives to incarceration for drug-related crime -- rare instances where the parties' rhetoric and philosophy are in relative alignment.

The parties' platform is a manifesto listing the principles that members support as a basis for getting their candidate elected to office. Voted upon by a platform committee, the platform does not necessarily match up precisely with the campaign promises made by the candidates, but represents a consensus that candidates like John McCain and Barack Obama endorse as they accept their parties nomination at the convention, where the platform is approved.

Healthcare reform is a stated goal of both political parties, and the 2008 Democratic and Republican platforms each touches at least briefly on the parity issue. "A culture of wellness needs to include the treatment of mental health conditions," states the GOP platform, adopted at the party's Minneapolis, Minn., convention in early September. "We believe all Americans should have access to affordable, quality health care, including individuals struggling with mental illness.  For this reason, we believe it is important that mental health care be treated equally with physical health care."

The Republican platform does not spell out whether its definition of mental-health parity includes addictive diseases; the Democratic platform is more specific. Under the heading of "Affordable, Quality Health Care Coverage for All Americans," the platform adopted by the Democrats at their August convention in Denver said families "should have health insurance coverage similar to what Members of Congress enjoy. They should not be forced to bear the burden of skyrocketing premiums, unaffordable deductibles or benefit limits that leave them at financial risk when they become sick.

"We will finally achieve long-overdue mental health and addiction treatment parity," the Democratic platform states. " ...  Chronic-care and behavioral health management should be assured for all Americans who require care coordination. This includes assistance for those recovering from traumatic, life-altering injuries and illnesses as well as those with mental health and substance use disorders. We should promote additional tobacco and substance abuse prevention." 

Both Republicans and Democrats promise to promote disease prevention and health promotion even as they differ sharply on how to reform the nation's healthcare system.

"Our nation faces epidemics of obesity and chronic diseases as well as new threats like pandemic flu and bioterrorism. Yet despite all of this, less than four cents of every health care dollar is spent on prevention and public health," note Democrats. "The American people understand that good health is the foundation of individual achievement and economic prosperity. Ensuring quality, affordable health care for every single American is essential to children's education, workers' productivity and businesses' competitiveness. We believe that covering all is not just a moral imperative, but is necessary to making our health system workable and affordable. Doing so would end cost-shifting from the uninsured, promote prevention and wellness, stop insurance discrimination, help eliminate health care disparities, and achieve savings through competition, choice, innovation, and higher quality care."

Republicans emphasize individual control over healthcare, using tools like health savings accounts to give consumers broader ability to choose a health insurance plan. "Chronic diseases -- in many cases, preventable conditions -- are driving health care costs, consuming three of every four health care dollars," the GOP platform notes. "We can reduce demand for medical care by fostering personal responsibility within a culture of wellness, while increasing access to preventive services, including improved nutrition and breakthrough medications that keep people healthy and out of the hospital. To reduce the incidence of diabetes, cancer, heart disease, and stroke, we call for a national grassroots campaign against obesity, especially among children. We call for continuation of efforts to decrease use of tobacco, especially among the young."

Also under the rubric of healthcare reform, the Republican Party endorsed parents' rights to consent to medical treatment for children, "including mental health treatment, drug treatment, alcohol treatment, and treatment involving pregnancy, contraceptives and abortion."

Supply Reduction, Law Enforcement and the Justice System

The Republicans have often been perceived as the party of "law and order," and this is evident in some of the platform language adopted in Minneapolis. "Our national experience over the past twenty years has shown that vigilance, tough yet fair prosecutors, meaningful sentences, protection of victims' rights, and limits on judicial discretion protect the innocent by keeping criminals off the streets," the platform states.

The GOP platform endorses mandatory sentences for crimes like gang conspiracy, violent or sexual offenses against children, rape, and assaults resulting in serious bodily injury, and opposes parole for violent or repeat felons. The platform also includes a call for a crackdown on gang violence, particularly gangs comprised of members who are illegal immigrants.

"Border security is essential to national security," the platform states. "In an age of terrorism, drug cartels, and criminal gangs, allowing millions of unidentified persons to enter and remain in this country poses grave risks to the sovereignty of the United States and the security of its people."

The GOP also cites the danger of narcoterrorism, stating, "In an era of porous borders, the war on drugs and the war on terror have become a single enterprise" and calling for greater support of countries like Mexico and Colombia in their battle against drugs.

On the other hand, the Republican platform specifically endorses drug courts and other state and local initiatives "that are trying new approaches to curbing drug abuse and diverting first-time offenders to rehabilitation." The party also called on government to work more closely with faith-based organizations to break the "cycle of incarceration" through diversion programs for juvenile offenders.

"The human toll of drug addiction and abuse hits all segments of American society," according to the Republican platform. "It is an international problem as well, with most of the narcotics in this country coming from beyond our borders. We will continue the fight against producers, traffickers, and distributors of illegal substances through the collaboration of state, federal, and local law enforcement. We support the work of those who help individuals struggling with addiction, and we support strengthening drug education and prevention programs to avoid addiction."

Democrats also pledged to "work with close partners like Mexico, Brazil, and Colombia on issues like ending the drug trade, fighting poverty and inequality, and immigration" and to a policy of being "smart on crime."

"That means being tough on violent crime, funding strategic, and effective community policing, and holding offenders accountable, and it means getting tough on the root causes of crime by investing in successful crime prevention, including proven initiatives that get youth and nonviolent offenders back on track," the Democratic platform states.

"We must help state, local, and tribal law enforcement work together to combat and prevent drug crime and drug and alcohol abuse, which are a blight on our communities," the Democrats' platform stated. "We will restore funding for the Byrne Justice Assistance Grant Program and expand the use of drug courts and rehabilitation programs for first-time, nonviolent drug offenders."

SHARE   

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by Tom Angell on 17 Sep 08 10:06 AM EDT
It's good to see both parties giving lip service to the idea that drug addiction is a disease and not a crime. But when will politicians act to repeal the laws that send people struggling with addiction to jail, strip them of college financial aid and food stamps, and make it near impossible for them to get jobs? When will lawmakers walk the walk?

Posted by John from Oceanside on 17 Sep 08 11:32 AM EDT
On the surface the platforms look the same, but in reality they are miles apart. In the article it the Democradic platform said "including proven initiatives that get youth and nonviolent offenders back on track," the Democratic platform states". This means Drug Policy Alliance and Laws like they are they are tring to get passed in California Prop 5 which will kill Drug Courts and takes away all accountability the addict has to face, it has no provision that mandates the individual to go to treatment. Not to mention it pretty much legalizes marijuana. The Drug Policy Alliance uses the guise of treatment to legalize drug use and dupe treatment providers to think they will recieve funding. The democrates get there money from George Soros and Soros funded through Drug Policy Alliance this California Proposition.

Posted by jrzshor on 17 Sep 08 02:26 PM EDT
most addicted folks are not criminals. but a lot of criminals are addicted. knowingthe difference will save lives and money.

Posted by John from Oceanside on 17 Sep 08 04:48 PM EDT
Dear jrzshor lots of addicts also do crime and if there are not any concequences thay won't get clean. I do no the difference I have been in the substance abuse field for 18 years and in that time Drug Court has been one of the most successful programs that deals with the addict who is not a hard core criminal and this Prop 5 will kill drug courts.

Posted by Laura Higgins on 18 Sep 08 08:20 AM EDT
Drug abuse is a family and community problem, not a political issue. Many parents are in denial about even the possibilty of their children abusing alcohol or drugs. Many blame the school for drug use. What people need to realize there are things you can do today, now. Find a local organization offer to donate your time, even an hour. Teenagers today need our attention. With the country is such economic turmoil it is doubtful that many politicians will respond. I sent out many emails to my elected officials, and received one personal response. Get involved and together as a community we can reduce drug addiction.

Posted by Margaret on 18 Sep 08 09:25 AM EDT
It's great to hear candidates talking about--gasp!--actually treating drug addiction when we know that is the real problem. It's about time! But it's all in the follow-through. Are they really going to put resources into treatment and recovery? Are they going to put actual money behind the Second Chance Act? Or are they just paying lip service? In California, we have a chance to dedicate resources now to expand treatment-instead-of-incarceration, to double funding for drug courts and to provide services to young people with drug problems before they run into trouble with the law (which would be a NEW thing in California). In just seven years, California's existing treatment-instead-of-incarceration program has graduated 84,000 people, saved nearly $2 billion and, according to UCLA, resulted in no increase in crime. This is a good start, but Prop. 5 would take it even bigger. Some people seem to be a bit confused about how it would work, so check it out for yourself: www.Prop5Yes.com

Posted by John from Oceanside on 18 Sep 08 11:42 AM EDT
Prop 5 is a sham and Margaret knows it she wrote it and it will not help anyone. Dear Margaret when we had funding for prop 36 from the Calif. Legislature you (Drug Policy Alliance)sued and killed the funding because it included flash incarceration. Prop 5 will not get more people into treatment because Prop 5 has no mandates (the addict doesn't have to go to treatment),an addict can get busted 5 times doing criminal acts (not simple possesion)before a mandate kicks in. Margaret is a very smart lady, she wrote Prop 5 and knows it is just a new way to legalize drugs.

Posted by Robert Curley, News Editor, Join Together on 18 Sep 08 02:19 PM EDT
Join Together's policy on public comments requires that they be on-topic. This story deals with the Democratic and Republican party platforms, neither of which have anything to say about the Drug Policy Alliance or California's Proposition 5. Therefore we would ask that you kindly limit your comments to the story at hand. There will be ample opportunity to debate the relative merits of Prop 5, but this is simply not the forum. As noted below, we reserve the right to remove further comments not conforming to these guidelines.

Posted by Allen McQuarrie on 18 Sep 08 02:34 PM EDT
Apparently, no good deed goes unpunished. We did our best to have a grassroots meeting of people in recovery to help form, join and assist and recovery organization succeed in establishing a plank in the national convention platforms. We are doing our best to reach and to influence public policy decision makers with an optimistic attitude. One thing we learn as we do this is how important a unified voice can be in making that success possible.

Posted by ThompsonL@StonehillCollege on 22 Sep 08 07:44 PM EDT
It's nice to see that both parties have recognized that drug addiction is a serious issue facing the country but it'll be interesting to see the plans put into action. The problem with addiction is that different areas in the country face different drug problems and there's no universal solution or treatment. The tricky part will be getting money into programs that are able to effectively help addicts overcome their dependency and rehabilitate them in such a way that they won't relapse. The worst thing that the government can do is throw money at the problem in the hopes of it just going away, there needs to be a good plan for where the money is going and how its being used.

Posted by Justin R @ Stonehill College on 22 Sep 08 08:11 PM EDT
Both platforms are headed in the right direction. The war on drugs needs to focus on the traffickers and less on the individual addicts and users. These individuals need treatment for their disease for them to enter or return to a positive position in society. The biggest problem with drugs is that they can be used recreationally. A drug conviction does not mean the person is an addict. The judicial system should see these discrepancies and help the individuals get back on the right track. Drug use will never disappear, but that does not mean we should accept it. The platforms of the parties seem to exemplify my beliefs the system on the other hand is doing the exact opposite. I hope that we are beginning to understand that incarceration is not the solution to the drug problem.

SUBMIT A COMMENT:

Note: Comments are now held for moderator approval. More info

Name:

Comment:
(limit 250
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
Please keep comments on-topic, courteous, clean, non-commercial, and within the word limit.
Read the complete guidelines