Stay Informed

Sign up for news & alerts

Already signed up?
Login here
What Can I Do?


Get Help
Need alcohol or drug help for yourself or someone else? GET HELP
Continuing Education
Free online courses for addiction counselors LEARN ONLINE
Resources
Resources
Find useful publications, online documents & more.


DrugScreening.org


 

Critics Say Health Plans Put Lives at Risk by Requiring Prior Approval for Buprenorphine
May 16, 2008

Share Share Email
Email
Print
Print
SubscribeSubscribe
News Feature
By Bob Curley

A major healthcare provider recently announced that it would begin requiring preauthorization for prescriptions of the buprenorphine-based addiction medications Suboxone and Subutex, a move that has raised concern among physicians and patient-advocacy groups about erecting new barriers to treatment.

United Healthcare and its Oxford Health Plans subsidiary announced the new preauthorization policy patients in April, stating, "Effective May 1, 2008, coverage for Suboxone and Subutex will be limited to the uses indicated in U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved labeling and other published clinical evidence. As part of our notification program, your doctor must provide information regarding your condition for which Suboxone and Subutex is being prescribed."

The new policy applies both to new prescriptions and renewals. Doctors writing prescriptions for Suboxone and Subutex now are required to call the company for a 'notification review' ... "We will then send a letter to you and your doctor indicating whether or not your medication is covered under your pharmacy benefit plan," according to the April 2008 letter from Oxford.

Michael W. Shore, M.D., a Cherry Hill, N.J., physician who has 100 current buprenorphine patients and has been prescribing the drug since it first became available for treatment of opiate addiction in 2002, said requiring preauthorization for Suboxone and Subutex was unworkable for both patients and physicians.

Shore, a solo practitioner, said he does not have the time to spend 20 minutes on the phone answering questions about preauthorization. "If this policy is allowed to continue I simply won't take on any new patients who have United Healthcare," he said.

"I think their point [of the policy] is to save money and discourage utilization," continued Shore. "The whole point of the DATA 2000 law [which authorized office-based buprenorphine prescriptions] was to expand access and this is putting impediments up ... Patients can't wait two or three days for a decision to be made. They are in opiate withdrawal and they are going to go out and use. I've had two patients die while waiting for treatment and I won't let it happen again."

Like this story? Get more by e-mail
Sign up for free updates

Tim Lepak, president of the National Alliance of Advocates for Buprenorphine Treatment, said that while buprenorphine patients are "really happy to see that more plans are paying for [the drug]," including Magellan, Blue Cross/Blue Shield and Cigna, he said that requiring preauthorization will prevent some patients from getting treatment. "They're putting patients' lives at risk," Lepak said.

Earlier this month, Shore wrote to Richard Justman, medical director of United Healthcare, calling for the policy to be reversed. "If the rationale ... is to somehow reduce treatment costs, I would point out that the efficacious use of Suboxone actually reduces healthcare costs by avoiding the much more costly treatment option of inpatient detoxification and rehabilitation," Shore wrote on May 6. "It is one thing to require preauthorization for inpatient treatment, but to require it for the outpatient option that often eliminates the need for inpatient treatment is penny wise and pound foolish."

In response, Justman wrote on May 8 that United Heathcare's main objective in requiring preauthorization was to prevent off-label prescriptions of Suboxone and Subutex, including for treatment of pain. Justman later offered to meet with Shore and other addiction medicine and addiction psychiatry experts to discuss the policy further.

Robert Lubran, director of the Division of Pharmacologic Therapies at the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), said that the federal agency has fielded a number of complaints about preauthorization of buprenorphine and is working to convene a meeting this summer of health plans, managed-care organizations, health-financing experts, treatment providers, and others. "We want to learn more about the issue and come up with a report that can help clarify what the issues are," he said.

Some other health plans, such as Bethesda, Md., based Coventry Health Care, also require preauthorization for buprenorphine. ValueOptions, a behavioral managed care company located in Norfolk, Va., limits access to the drug in other ways, including a requirement that patients have failed at other types of rehabilitation before being eligible to receive Suboxone or Subutex, limiting reimbursement for prescriptions to six months, and charging a $20 copay.

In 2007, a survey by the Center for a Healthy Maryland found that preauthorization requirements, insufficient reimbursement, and confusing Medicaid rules had made many doctors in the state reluctant to prescribe buprenorphine.

Lubran said that the proposed SAMHSA meeting would provide a current overview of preauthorization practices among health plans nationally.

COMMENTS ON THIS ARTICLE:

Posted by R. Johnson on 14 Jun 08 11:53 AM EDT
I have been using suboxone, first for addiction to fentanyl, second, continuation of pain treatment. It works very well for both conditions. It is very bad for govt. to create barriers for patients who use this in both addiction, and pain relief. By requiring preauth. everytime to get suboxone, the govt. seems to want people to be in a CLOUD of opiate addiction. Ive been there and SUBOXONE relieves my pain without creating my ADDICTION MONSTER. Pain relief guidelines need to change with the times. I wish I could push a button and let those who establish these barriers feel the pain that I feel and the way Suboxone controls the pain without the Horrible addiction side effects. Thanks to this med I am still alive and alert.

Posted by Chuck Sigler, D.Phil., CAC on 22 May 08 08:48 AM EDT
For once I agree with the HMO caution and expectations. Another study of fatal poisonings in Nordic countries (Steentoft et al. 2006) found that while heroin/morphine was the primary intoxicant in Norway, Iceland and Sweden, a higher percentage of the overdose deaths in Finland was from buprenorphine. Buprenorphine has been available in France as an outpatient treatment for opioid dependence since 1996. Since that date, several deaths have been attributed to the drug. Post mortem blood samples in one study even indicated that buprenorphine and its primary metabolite norbuprenophine appeared to be within the therapeutic range. Intravenous injection of crushed tablets, a concomitant intake of psychotropics (especially benzodiazepines and neuroleptics) and the high dosage of the buprenorphine formulation available in France appear as the major risk factors for such fatalities. Only two of the deaths appeared to be suicide-related (Kintz 2001).

Posted by Chuck Sigler, D.Phil., CAC on 22 May 08 08:43 AM EDT
A British study (Schifano et al. 2005) examined data on buprenorphine mortality between 1980 and 2002. It concluded that when combined with other drugs, the risk of buprenorphine lethality has increased. Benzodiazepines were frequently taken with buprenorphine, confirming similar findings in previous studies. While the blood levels of 117 fatalities for buprenorphine were mostly within the therapeutic range, “a concomitant intake of benzodiazepines” acted as a major risk factor for such fatalities. In seven mortality cases, buprenorphine alone was detected, raising questions about the reported high safety profile suggested in the studies reviewed here and elsewhere. Bupe was also frequently taken in conjunction with opiates and painkillers by the fatalities studied. This study underscores the importance for physicians to be cautious when prescribing buprenorphine to individuals in conjunction with benzodiazepines or who demonstrate concurrent opiate use while taking buprenorphine. Overdose and death are potential outcomes when buprenorphine is combined with other CNS depressants. Bupe doctors need to take the time to get an accurate psychosocial history.

Posted by Pete on 20 May 08 03:49 PM EDT
Interesting reading: INCB/2007 127. "The increased use of buprenorphine for medical purposes has been accompanied by increased diversion of buprenorphine preparations. The Board reiterates its request to all Governments that experience such problems to strengthen the control measures applied to buprenorphine, in order to stop the diversion of that substance from licit distribution channels." ************ From the Baltimore Sun, December 16, 2007 The 'bupe' fix By Fred Schulte and Doug Donovan ****************** Diversion and Abuse of Buprenorphine: A Brief Assessment of Emerging Indicators Final Report (SAMSHA) Nov. 30, 2006 ******************** People successfully treated with buprenorphine should have access. At the same time, prevention of abuse and diversion of burprenorphine is a serious issue and addressed as such.

Posted by Jean on 20 May 08 11:24 AM EDT
It's always about MONEY and those of us who have worked yrs in the addiction field know we are at the bottom of the list. Common sense says addicts need suboxone treatment when the moment hits they want help. The abuse of suboxone comes from people who look for withdrawal relief but are not ready to work on recovery. If a Dr. uses suboxone for pain rather than addiction -- so what if it works. We may be a democratic society but the captialist part dominants in who gets services aand where we spend our money!!

Posted by Steve on 20 May 08 06:34 AM EDT
As a certified alcohol and drug counselor for over ten years I have found Suboxone an important tool to use in treating people with opiod addiction. The prescribing physicians I work with require a weekly forty-five minute session with my clients as well as a thorough review of my notes by the physician and client when they meet for reauthorization. We have a system that brings hope and peace to many who have been hopeless and living in chaos for years. Why punish the many for the problems of a few? Once again we have a system that is working at the grass roots level being "tweaked" by the officials who have generally not ever had the privlege of working with a client who believes they have a chance at life. But then again we are talking about people addicted to substances sometimes referred to as "those people". It is time that the system listens to those clients and practioners that are experiencing success at the "worker ant " level and stop "fixing " something that is not broken!

Posted by John on 19 May 08 08:34 PM EDT
Dan White had 2 (TWO) patients patients come to him with Suboxone "addictions" In a year and a half. How many hundreds were successfully treated and remained functioning, constructive members of our society? I have talked with many doctors who have treated hundreds and hundreds of patients with Suboxone and in their experience Suboxone has been hugely successful in treating opiate addictions in street addicts as well as those with chronic pain who have been barely getting through life bing treated with the other, stultifying short and long acting opiates. I have personally experienced the transformation Suboxone can make in a person's life and consider it nothing less than a "miracle" drug.

Posted by Scott on 19 May 08 08:21 PM EDT
I have been prescribed Suboxone for pain and the last 3 months with Suboxone freed me from 18 YEARS of various prescribed opiate medications that never really worked anyway but I had a definite physical dependence. I am now pain free, happy, and energetic, lost my depression, am well enough to feel like dating again and loving life. Why is Suboxone not approved for pain? There are always people who "abuse" medications. This seems to be much less a problem with Suboxone. I have no desire to "take more"; I am now comfortable and functioning. I never thought about the pharmacist in my town thinking I was being treated for addiction, he is my pharmacist who has been filling prescriptions for all these other short acting and long acting opiates for all these years and listening to me ask for a better solution. I am calling my state and national legislators and asking them for help in this matter. I think we have the right to not live in pain.

Posted by Opiferum on 19 May 08 04:38 PM EDT
The misuse of Suboxone and Subutex will not diminish with the above implementations - neither will the number of patients seeking street drugs that are at great risk of OD-ing in the period of time it takes to be accepted for treatment!

Posted by Anonymous 2 on 19 May 08 03:31 PM EDT
Unfortunately buprenorphine is being abused and misused. In addition, in order to prescribe outside of legal patient practice limits or have non-physician prescribers writing for Subutex/Suboxone (NPs, PAs etc) there are many prescriptions for off-label use, i.e. pain. Patients are not guaranteed any of the other non-drug therapies like counseling. No one is arguing the benefits of OBT with buprenorphine. Prior authorization will assure treatment as intended in labeling and according to DATA.

Posted by Dan White on 19 May 08 12:27 PM EDT
Two years ago, an addiction counselor from England, John Chamberlain, The Alchemy Project Ltd, Former Director, sent me a series of articles discussing the use of Suboxone in Asia. One article stated that in Singapore, Suboxone was the number one choice of illicit drugs being used and carried a stiff penalty for its use. Until the end of March, I was a Primary Residential Treatment Counselor in a facility in Ohio. During my year and a half working there, I had two clients that came from a Suboxone treatment program in our city with addictions to Suboxone. They stated they enjoyed the high they received with Suboxone greater than with the heroine they had used formerly. Food for thought. Why do we prescribe something that is viewed in other countries as an illegal drug and we have clients addicted to it as a great source for treatment alternatives?

Posted by John French on 19 May 08 11:42 AM EDT
There is nothing new in the preauthorization gambit, which is used for a long list of treatments in order to reduce access to medical care, thus saving providers money at the expense of seriously ill patients. But this one is more absurd than most. What sane person would want to go on narcotic maintenance unless they really needed it?

Posted by Phil on 19 May 08 08:43 AM EDT
As an ret ired government executive responsible for budget and funding, and a recovering alocholic I am amazed at the lack of thought that goes into refusing relatively low cost therapy drugs while not balancing that against the cost, both in human suffering and long term medical costs of untreated substance abuse. Think of the cost of medical care, the cost of long term incarceration, etc. Defines penny wise and pound foolish

Posted by Anonymous on 19 May 08 08:36 AM EDT
why dont they make it this difficult to obtain cigarettes?

Your Turn! Post a public comment (read guidelines):

Name:

Comment:
(limit 200
words)

Enter this word
(help):
Change

GUIDELINES: 
To keep this feature useful for all, please:

  1. Keep it clean, courteous, and on-topic. Comments are meant for thoughtful discussion of the article published above.

  2. Do not post promotional links to organizations, products or services, or personal requests for assistance (get help).

  3. Proof your comments carefully, use good spelling and punctuation, and don't use ALL CAPS. Comments are published immediately and cannot be edited.

Deceptive, slanderous and commercially-motivated posts are prohibited. We reserve the right to remove comments not conforming to these guidelines. (Report a comment).

Have questions or feedback? Contact us.